NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management vs. Oracle Coherence

NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management

Oracle Coherence

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	NetApp SnapCenter software is presented by the vendor as a simple, unified platform for application-consistent data protection and clone management. They state the software simplifies backup, restore, and clone lifecycle management with application-integrated workflows. Leveraging storage-based data management, SnapCenter is offered to enable increased performance and availability and reduced testing and development times.	N/A
Oracle Coherence	Score 7.9 out of 10	N/A	Oracle Coherence is database management and development software.	N/A

Pricing

NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management

Oracle Coherence

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management	Oracle Coherence
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management	Oracle Coherence
Considered Both Products	NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management Verified User Anonymous Chose NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management If the size of the VM is somewhere 10TB, the Commvault will take more than 24 hours to take a full file-level backup. At the same time, NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management will take a few seconds Incentivized Helpful?	Oracle Coherence Gene Baker Vice President, Chief Architect, Development Manager and Software Engineer Chose Oracle Coherence Oracle Coherence is more straightforward to deploy than IBM Datapower ExtremeScale. We used ExtremeScale previously in the form of their Datapower caching appliances. The firmware was difficult to upgrade in the appliances, and we had trouble getting them patched … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Oracle Coherence Coherence kicks Redis's butt when it comes to performance and feature set. However, it lags far behind in terms of market penetration and cloud readiness. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Oracle Coherence I did not get involved with selecting Oracle Coherence. It was already implemented when I joined the team. As I mentioned, Ehcache is probably the most well-known competitor and it is an open source application. If I were to build a new application now, I would think first … Incentivized Helpful? Sergey Blashkov Senior Java Developer Chose Oracle Coherence DataSynapse GridServer has the same cache functionality connected with a grid distributed application deployment platform. It provides all the necessary tools to configure and manage these applications. On the otherhand Oracle Coherence has more a flexible configuration and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Oracle Coherence Not applicable Incentivized Helpful?

Features

NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management

Oracle Coherence

Database Development

Comparison of Database Development features of Product A and Product B
	NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management 10.0 Ratings 16% above category average	Oracle Coherence 8.7 Ratings 2% above category average
Version control tools	10.00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Test data generation	10.00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings
Performance optimization tools	10.00 Ratings	9.30 Ratings
Schema maintenance	10.00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Database change management	10.00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings

Database Administration

Comparison of Database Administration features of Product A and Product B
	NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management 8.5 Ratings 6% above category average	Oracle Coherence 8.3 Ratings 3% above category average
User management	7.00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Database security	9.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Database status reporting	9.00 Ratings	7.20 Ratings
Change management	9.00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management	Oracle Coherence
Small Businesses	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management	Oracle Coherence
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	7.8 (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management	Oracle Coherence
Likelihood to Recommend	It's great to test and develop new applications. Terrific to identify new and discover networks. Excellent with cost tracking and asset management. Intuitive user interface. Incentivized George Kennedy Financial Analyst Read full review	It literally all boils down to the budget a team has. Nowadays, even investment banks look for every opportunity to cut cost. Oracle Coherence is a pretty robust and highly configurable cache application that every team should use if they can afford. If they can't, then open source code is their answer. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	VM backup via volume NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management It can be used in DB aware backup Provide quick data restoration Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Distributed in memory data managment. Your data is near your data manipulator or calculator engine. Write behind, read through, write through concept. Fault tolerance and scalable. Continueous query, live events, map reduced aggregiation, extend client are few of the very good features I have used. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	integration with other backup solutions ease of management The interface needs to be improved Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Better documentation on setting up various use cases. Incentivized Gene Baker Vice President, Chief Architect, Development Manager and Software Engineer Read full review
Usability	It's faster and more secure with data with high-level security layers. Incentivized George Kennedy Financial Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	For its efficiency with database backup and recovery. Incentivized George Kennedy Financial Analyst Read full review	Oracle Coherence support team is responsive and knowledgeable. We contacted them to ask a couple of design questions about how we were setting up Oracle Coherence based on how we used IBM's Datapower Extreme Scale. They were able to guide us so that we got the design correct the first time and didn't have to go back and re-architect our design later. Incentivized Gene Baker Vice President, Chief Architect, Development Manager and Software Engineer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	If the size of the VM is somewhere 10TB, the Commvault will take more than 24 hours to take a full file-level backup. At the same time, NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management will take a few seconds Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Coherence kicks Redis's butt when it comes to performance and feature set. However, it lags far behind in terms of market penetration and cloud readiness. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Not calculated anything yet Saves of engineer effort The solution saves our time Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Better performance allows us to onboard more clients Decom few mainframes that were needed to handle lots of DB queries Better customer service with intraday calculations ability. Incentivized Sergey Blashkov Senior Java Developer Read full review
ScreenShots