TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

NetApp SnapRestore vs. PrestoDB (or Presto)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    SnapRestore

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ANetApp SnapRestore software uses stored Snapshot copies to recover entire file systems or data volumes. Whether users want to recover a single file or a multi-terabyte data volume, the vendor states that SnapRestore software makes data recovery automatic and near instantaneous regardless of storage capacity or number of files.N/A

    PrestoDB (or Presto)

    Score10 out of 10
    N/APresto is an open source SQL query engine designed to run queries on data stored in Hadoop or in traditional databases. Teradata supported development of Presto followed the acquisition of Hadapt and Revelytix.N/A
    Pricing
    SnapRestorePrestoDB (or Presto)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SnapRestorePrestoDB (or Presto)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    SnapRestorePrestoDB (or Presto)
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon RDS
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    SAP IQ
    Score5.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    SnapRestorePrestoDB (or Presto)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SnapRestorePrestoDB (or Presto)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    NetApp
    Honestly, any time that data is in play and it is very important, you should consider using SnapRestore to back it up correctly. We always want to have a failsafe and SnapRestore is ours. We know the data is safe and can be re-uploaded to any of our main servers so it gives us peace of mind.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Presto is for interactive simple queries, where Hive is for reliable processing. If you have a fact-dim join, presto is great..however for fact-fact joins presto is not the solution.. Presto is a great replacement for proprietary technology like Vertica
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    NetApp
    • It's interface
    • It's well priced
    • It's very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Linking, embedding links and adding images is easy enough.
    • Once you have become familiar with the interface, Presto becomes very quick & easy to use (but, you have to practice & repeat to know what you are doing - it is not as intuitive as one would hope).
    • Organizing & design is fairly simple with click & drag parameters.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    NetApp
    • More options for data saving
    • different ways to save files
    • have more licenses per org
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Presto was not designed for large fact fact joins. This is by design as presto does not leverage disk and used memory for processing which in turn makes it fast.. However, this is a tradeoff..in an ideal world, people would like to use one system for all their use cases, and presto should get exhaustive by solving this problem.
    • Resource allocation is not similar to YARN and presto has a priority queue based query resource allocation..so a query that takes long takes longer...this might be alleviated by giving some more control back to the user to define priority/override.
    • UDF Support is not available in presto. You will have to write your own functions..while this is good for performance, it comes at a huge overhead of building exclusively for presto and not being interoperable with other systems like Hive, SparkSQL etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    NetApp
    I wasn't involved in the decision-making process related to SnapRestore. My boss said that she reviewed various different platforms, not sure which ones, and she liked SnapRestore the most and that it made the most sense for our business. So far, we have yet to have any issues and the decision was a great choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Presto is good for a templated design appeal. You cannot be too creative via this interface - but, the layout and options make the finalized visual product appealing to customers. The other design products I use are for different purposes and not really comparable to Presto.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    NetApp
    • Very positive
    • We haven't lost any data since we started with SnapRestore
    • Had to use it once and worked like a charm
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Presto has helped scale Uber's interactive data needs. We have migrated a lot out of proprietary tech like Vertica.
    • Presto has helped build data driven applications on its stack than maintain a separate online/offline stack.
    • Presto has helped us build data exploration tools by leveraging it's power of interactive and is immensely valuable for data scientists.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots