NetCrunch by AdRem Software vs. Nmap
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() NetCrunch | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | NetCrunch is commercial, self-hosted, agentless network and IT infrastructure monitoring software that runs on Windows Server. It monitors network devices, servers, virtualization platforms, cloud services, applications, websites, certificates, logs, traffic flows, and custom data using SNMP, WMI, SSH, REST APIs, scripts, and telemetry. NetCrunch supports 680+ monitoring targets and includes 270+ ready-to-use Monitoring Packs for devices, applications, and operating… | $2,550 per year node based with optional additional interfaces |
Nmap | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Nmap is a free, open source network discovery, mapper, and security auditing software. Its core features include port scanning identifying unknown devices, testing for security vulnerabilities, and identifying network issues. | $49,980 one-time fee |
| NetCrunch | Nmap | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | NetCrunch licensing is based on monitored nodes and interfaces rather than individual sensors, checks or metrics. Each node license includes one monitored interface. Additional interface licenses are required only when more interfaces than nodes need to be monitored. Professional and Enterprise are available as annual subscriptions or perpetual licenses, while Ultimate is available as an annual subscription. License size can be adjusted as monitoring requirements change. | All perpetual licenses include a six-month trial period during which you can cancel for any reason and receive a full refund of all money paid (including maintenance). The term license is only a 3-month commitment and cal also be terminated with full refund during the first 30 days of the initial quarter. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NetCrunch | Nmap | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 14 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| NetCrunch | Nmap | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NetCrunch | Nmap | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PingPlotter Score9 out of 10 | PingPlotter Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Nmap Score8.7 out of 10 | PingPlotter Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NetCrunch | Nmap | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.4 |
| NetCrunch | Nmap | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | NetCrunch Screenshots |









