Netskope Private Access vs. Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Netskope Private Access
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway (replacing the former McAfee Web Gateway) is presented by the vendor as high-performance on-premises web security, that can be deployed as dedicated hardware or a virtual machine. With it, users can enforce internet-use policies, analyze the nature and intent of content and active code entering the network, and use DLP technology to scan outbound traffic.N/A
Pricing
Netskope Private AccessSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netskope Private AccessSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Netskope Private AccessSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
10.0
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
7.5
3 Ratings
19% below category average
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
6.8
4 Ratings
14% below category average
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Network Analytics7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification6.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
7.8
4 Ratings
11% below category average
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Continuous Verification8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Flow Control7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin Access Control9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Netskope Private AccessSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Netskope Private AccessSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(3 ratings)
7.7
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Netskope Private AccessSkyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
Netskope
For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
McAfee Web Gateway is best suited for all types of organizations if they wan to achieve the security for their users as it has the large intel database as well. The best part is its flexible hybrid deployment methods- it can be deployed on premises (hardware and virtual), in the cloud, or both for the high availability.
Read full review
Pros
Netskope
  • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
  • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
  • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
  • Great malware protection.
  • Excellent sandboxing.
  • Great URL filtering.
  • Very good pre-defined policies.
Read full review
Cons
Netskope
  • When a blocking alert pops up, the user could click to request it be enabled, making it easier to create the policy.
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
  • Support response
  • Better pricing
  • Best practices guides
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Netskope
We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
No answers on this topic
Usability
Netskope
As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
Excellent products based on all the needs we had. Most of our use cases has been able to implement. DLP is kind of difficult to implement but possible. However you needs a big team to handle the tools as it's capabilities and management is complex. Nevertheles you can find a way to leverage all the funcionality when needed.
Read full review
Support Rating
Netskope
The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Netskope
The process was smooth and well managed.
There was probably good technical coordination and support.
There were only minor details that could be improved.
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Netskope
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
The configuration of the Cisco Secure Web Appliance of even worse than the one of Skyhigh's Secure Web Gateway. The detecction rate was slightly higher but the visibility worse.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Netskope
  • Re-authentication improves the security.
  • Application access is more stable.
  • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
Read full review
Skyhigh Security
  • An effective tool in enforcing Internet policies.
  • Adds a necessary layer of Internet security over and above UTM Firewall offerings.
Read full review
ScreenShots