NGINX vs. Payara Server
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
Payara Server | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Payara Server is a fully supported, developer-friendly, open source application server. The vendor says Payara Server’s architecture is innovative, cloud-native and optimized for production deployments. The application server is built and supported by a team of DevOps engineers dedicated to the continued development and maintenance of the open source software and committed to optimizing Payara Server for production Java EE applications. Key features of Payara Server include: •… | N/A |
| NGINX | Payara Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Payara Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| NGINX | Payara Server | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Payara Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | Payara Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | - | 10.0 |
| NGINX | Payara Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots | Payara Server Screenshots |












