NGINX vs. SUSE Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create…N/A
SUSE Security
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SUSE® Security (formerly NeuVector) provides an end-to-end container security platform. This includes end-to-end vulnerability scanning and complete run-time protection for containers, pods and hosts.N/A
Pricing
NGINXSUSE Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NGINXSUSE Security
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NGINXSUSE Security
Considered Both Products
NGINX
Chose NGINX
Evolution and coupling with F5

Evolución y acople con F5
Chose NGINX
HAProxy Community Edition, HAProxy Enterprise and NGINX Ingress Controller
Chose NGINX
We chose NGINX because, in our experience, NGINX is a Better product and does its core role
Chose NGINX
All of those are paid solutions with very good features, but they also offer dedicated scenarios for web application hosting. If you run applications on on-premises web servers and don't have a Microsoft licence agreement, Nginx is a very good and reliable option, based on …
Chose NGINX
NGINX its part of Modular Solution and can be used integrated with XC and BIG IP
Chose NGINX
In our organization, we use different solutions depending on if the database is on premise or in the cloud. We went from multiple solutions across different departments towards a more consolidated model to achieve standardization and economies of scale. We’ve mainly moved …
Chose NGINX
Apache AGE, Azure Front Door and F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Chose NGINX
NGINX is more expensive than HA Proxy.
Chose NGINX
The support and ability to provide near zero downtime for changes is a winner. The lightweight engine also helps reduce cost.
Chose NGINX
Apache HTTP Server, Apache Tomcat and Microsoft IIS
Chose NGINX
Easy to Install and configure.
Pick the configuration dynamically without restarting
All the configurations at one place
Chose NGINX
NGINX is faster to deploy and it has minimal setup needs for our POCs over Apache Tomcat
Chose NGINX
How does it compare? We use Apache ATP server and we also use Tom Cat also owned by Apache, but both Apache, ATP, and MKA. They are relatively older than GX and so they're one problem for Apache and MKA they need more power, more memory, and more space.
Chose NGINX
NGINX have higher market share which obviously show to us it is the preferred choice of most of the customers. Both of platform competes in the Web and Application server areas, but due the security features of NGINX be more flexible this in my opinion makes more sense.
Chose NGINX
It is like comparing a formula 1 car against a regular street car in terms of performance or installation simplicity
Chose NGINX
Apache is a market leader but NGINX is new and has new features. Lightweight and can handle static requests. We use EC2 and I believe NGINX is more suited when it comes to scalability.
Chose NGINX
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
SUSE Security
Chose SUSE Security
SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig …
Features
NGINXSUSE Security
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
NGINX
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
SUSE Security
-
Ratings
IDE support8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NGINXSUSE Security
Small Businesses
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Score 9.6 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Score 7.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Score 7.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NGINXSUSE Security
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NGINXSUSE Security
Likelihood to Recommend
[NGINX] is very well suited for high performance. I have seen it used on servers with 1k current connections with no issues. Despite seeing it used in many environments I've never seen software developers use it over apache, express, IIS in local dev environments so it may be more difficult to setup. I've also seen it used to load balance again without issues.
Read full review
overall experience so far is good with product and its features.good to have such product in the IT industry to go for it when it come to kubernetes-native container security platform it have the ability to have deep visibility into your network which is the critical part of run-time container security.
Read full review
Pros
  • Straight-forward configuration format that users of all skill levels can learn, and yet is powerful enough for the huge breadth of features that Nginx provides.
  • Massive scale right out the box. We've never had a Nginx instance overwhelmed by requests, and if we did it would be trivial to spin up more Nginx instances to handle the load.
  • SSL termination means that we can deliver content over HTTPS without needing our individual services to require TLS support. This saves us a lot of time and headache while keeping us secure.
  • Nginx is open-source and free, meaning that anyone can use it to power their services, from individual projects to billion-dollar websites.
Read full review
  • Scans containers software for known vulnerabilities
  • Denies command execution in containers
  • Prevents unwanted network connections from/to containers
Read full review
Cons
  • Customer support can be strangely condescending, perhaps it's a language issue?
  • I find it a little weird how the release versions used for Nginx+ aren't the same as for open source version. It can be very confusing to determine the cross-compatibility of modules, etc., because of this.
  • It seems like some (most?) modules on their own site are ancient and no longer supported, so their documentation in this area needs work.
  • It's difficult to navigate between nginx.com commercial site and customer support. They need to be integrated together.
  • I'd love to see more work done on nginx+ monitoring without requiring logging every request. I understand that many statistics can only be derived from logs, but plenty should work without that. Logging is not an option in many environments.
Read full review
  • I like everything about NeuVector. They are on the right development path.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Great value for the product
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
This tool is really easy to use and configure. Consumes very less system resources. It is highly modular and configurable. You can easily use it with other tools like certbot for SSLs. You can configure basic security with configuration and headers
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Community support is great, and they've also had a presence at conferences. Overall, there is no shortage of documentation and community support. We're currently using it to serve up some WordPress sites, and configuring NGINX for this purpose is well documented.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
All of those are paid solutions with very good features, but they also offer dedicated scenarios for web application hosting. If you run applications on on-premises web servers and don't have a Microsoft licence agreement, Nginx is a very good and reliable option, based on Linux distributions and available as freeware.
Read full review
SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig does not have such ability. Sysdig is not an open-source solution, but SUSE NeuVector is.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our websites are noticeably faster, causing an increase in customer satisfaction.
  • Nginx has such a low memory/resource footprint that we save money from not needing multiple large, expensive servers.
  • Ability to load balance traffic, have server-redundancy, and have high-availability allows for 100% uptime and provides cost-effective solutions to alternatives that can cost a lot.
Read full review
  • We went from being blind to what happens in the Kubernetes network to seeing everything and being able to control Kubernetes network communications.
  • Now we are able to detect vulnerable containers faster.
Read full review
ScreenShots

NGINX Screenshots

Screenshot of Overview of the NGINX Application PlatformScreenshot of NGINX Controller - MonitoringScreenshot of NGINX Controller - Configuration