NGINX vs. Tenable Nessus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NGINX
Score 9.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create…N/A
Tenable Nessus
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Tenable headquartered in Columbia offers Nessus, a vulnerability scanning and security assessment solution used to analyze an entity's security posture, vulnerability testing, and provide configuration assessments.
$2,790
Pricing
NGINXTenable Nessus
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
1 Year
$2,790.00
1 Year + Advanced Support
$3,190.00
2 Years
$5,440.00
2 Years + Advanced Support
$6,240.00
3 Years
$7,951.00
3 Years + Advanced Support
$9,151.00
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NGINXTenable Nessus
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NGINXTenable Nessus
Features
NGINXTenable Nessus
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
NGINX
7.9
24 Ratings
1% below category average
Tenable Nessus
-
Ratings
IDE support7.412 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management7.920 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management7.120 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation9.921 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance7.118 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
NGINX
-
Ratings
Tenable Nessus
4.7
2 Ratings
51% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings1.32 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings3.12 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings9.72 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings3.12 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings3.22 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings2.92 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
NGINX
-
Ratings
Tenable Nessus
6.1
2 Ratings
28% below category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings7.12 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings5.22 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings5.22 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings3.12 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NGINXTenable Nessus
Small Businesses
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Score 8.2 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Score 8.2 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NGINXTenable Nessus
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(51 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(4 ratings)
9.7
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(4 ratings)
7.1
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
NGINXTenable Nessus
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
[NGINX] is very well suited for high performance. I have seen it used on servers with 1k current connections with no issues. Despite seeing it used in many environments I've never seen software developers use it over apache, express, IIS in local dev environments so it may be more difficult to setup. I've also seen it used to load balance again without issues.
Read full review
Tenable
It is an excellent tool for scanning servers, workstations, and network devices to identify missing patches and misconfiguration; we regularly use it to confirm patch effectiveness after the update; it also helps us for preparing audits such as iso 27001, and regulatory requirements, it also helps us to identify open ports and services that violate security.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • Very low memory usage. Can handle many more connections than alternatives (like Apache HTTPD) due to low overhead. (event-based architecture).
  • Great at serving static content.
  • Scales very well. Easy to host multiple Nginx servers to promote high availability.
  • Open-Source (no cost)!
Read full review
Tenable
  • Nessus is best at performing vulnerability scans, in fact, it gives findings and moreover accurate findings of the assessments. It does not do penetration testing or exploit the vulnerabilities because it is concerned about scanning the systems/applications.
  • In fact, Nessus has multiple profiles/policies to perform different types of scans such as, scans oriented for PCI-DSS, malware scans, web application scans, bad shell shock detection scan to name a few.
  • Nessus has the ability to classify the vulnerabilities into risk-based categories from critical to even informational which I think is one of the things that separates Nessus from other vulnerability scanners.
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • Customer support can be strangely condescending, perhaps it's a language issue?
  • I find it a little weird how the release versions used for Nginx+ aren't the same as for open source version. It can be very confusing to determine the cross-compatibility of modules, etc., because of this.
  • It seems like some (most?) modules on their own site are ancient and no longer supported, so their documentation in this area needs work.
  • It's difficult to navigate between nginx.com commercial site and customer support. They need to be integrated together.
  • I'd love to see more work done on nginx+ monitoring without requiring logging every request. I understand that many statistics can only be derived from logs, but plenty should work without that. Logging is not an option in many environments.
Read full review
Tenable
  • The tool has lots of options for setting up before scanning any device, this methodology could be simplified further with default configuration for various devices predefined, anyhow we can use this technique by making use of policies.
  • For advanced users we cannot disable the plugins inside the plugin groups, we can enable the whole set of plugins at a time, for few hundreds its ok, but thousands of plugins are of waste of resource and time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
Great value for the product
Read full review
Tenable
Nessus is best and easy to use application for Vulnerabilities finding and reporting, it has multiple platforms and wide scope covering almost all devices for security improvement so far, thus we are very likely to continue its services.
Read full review
Usability
F5
Front end proxy and reverse proxy of Nginx is always useful. I always prefer to Nginx in overall usability when you have application server and database or multiple application servers and single database i.e. clustered application. Nginx provides really good features and flexibility which helps the system administrator in case of troubleshooting and also from the administration perspective. Also, Nginx doesn't delay any request because of internal performance issues.
Read full review
Tenable
It's very much a plug and play application that the user can go into with limited knowledge and set-up scans in minutes.
Read full review
Support Rating
F5
Community support is great, and they've also had a presence at conferences. Overall, there is no shortage of documentation and community support. We're currently using it to serve up some WordPress sites, and configuring NGINX for this purpose is well documented.
Read full review
Tenable
I haven't needed to contact support yet. But issues are easily solved with a quick internet search which means support and by extension, the larger community are involved and knowledgeable.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
F5
We have used Traffic, Apache, Google Cloud Load Balancing and other managed cloud-based load balancers. When it comes to scale and customization nothing beats Nginx. We selected Nginx over the others because
  • we have a large number of services and we can manage a single Nginx instance for all of them
  • we have high impact services and Nginx never breaks a sweat under load
  • individual services have special considerations and Nginx lets us configure each one uniquely
Read full review
Tenable
Sometimes when we identify a vulnerability with Nessus that has an exploit, we made a proof of concept with Metasploit in order to show to the IT managers the importance of the software/hardware hardening.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • Nginx has decreased the burden of web server administration and maintenance, and we are spending less time on server issues than when we were using Apache.
  • Nginx has allowed more people in our company to get involved with configuring things on the web server, so there's no longer a single point of failure ("the Apache guy").
  • Nginx has given us the ability to handle a larger number of requests without scaling up in hardware quite so quickly.
Read full review
Tenable
  • Nessus certainly has a positive impact while me while performing my job, either as security research, or performing vulnerability assessments for clients. It gives a lot of information about the system/application after performing scans. The number of false positives is also less compared to other vulnerability scanners.
  • The professional edition is very useful as policy templates available in this edition are very handy and useful even to perform compliance scan like PCI DSS scan.
  • Also, the ability to export the scan results into reports in formats like HTML, PDF is very useful which could be for performing system/application reviews.
Read full review
ScreenShots

NGINX Screenshots

Screenshot of Overview of the NGINX Application PlatformScreenshot of NGINX Controller - MonitoringScreenshot of NGINX Controller - Configuration