NGINX vs. Tenable Security Center
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
Tenable Security Center | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises. | N/A |
| NGINX | Tenable Security Center | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Tenable Security Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | 100% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| NGINX | Tenable Security Center | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Tenable Security Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | Tenable Security Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 9.4 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| NGINX | Tenable Security Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |












