NGINX vs. Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF) | N/A | N/A | Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF) helps internal and external Tencent Cloud users fight security issues such as web attacks, intrusions, exploits, trojans, tampering, backdoors, crawlers and domain name hijacking. By deploying WAF, corporate users can redirect the threat and pressure of web attacks to the protection cluster nodes of WAF, obtaining the web business protection capabilities of Tencent Cloud in to safeguard websites and secure the operations of web businesses. | N/A |
| NGINX | Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| NGINX | Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | ![]() F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF Score9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | ![]() F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF Score9.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| NGINX | Tencent Cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |










