TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Nikto vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Nikto

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ANikto is an open source fast (not stealthy) vulnerability testing tool that can be used in penetration testing or purple team exercises.N/A

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A
    Pricing
    NiktoOpenText Application Quality Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    NiktoOpenText Application Quality Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    NiktoOpenText Application Quality Management
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    NiktoOpenText Application Quality Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    NiktoOpenText Application Quality Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    Nikto is well suited for scanning web server-related vulnerabilities for small and medium enterprises. We can utilise it for checking server default files and security misconfigurations. It is not suited well for some users because it is CLI based tool and not a GUI based. Also, community and OEM support are not available for this tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Well known tool
    • Source code available
    • Wweb server vulnerability scanner
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Can be made GUI based for ease of users
    • User community should be there
    • Development and support should be available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Improved security posture of organisation.
    • Improved in regulatory and corporate compliance.
    • Easy to use result in adaptation of this tool by business users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots