Numeric vs. SAP Advanced Financial Closing

Numeric helps connect our finance and accounting teams like never before. It works for me individually and in a team capacity. Whether tracking my own tasks or checking the progress of other collaborative tasks Numeric has been perfect. The flux analysis has also made it incredibly easy to drill down into details of where our books have changed month over month. As such, I can ask more concise questions of our accounting team.

If asked, I think I am likely to recommend SAP Advanced Financial Closing to a colleague for MEC (month end closing)

Incentivized

• Makes the organization of tasks super easy to monitor both others and myself
• Flux analysis helps prepare our variance to see where accounts may have had changes we want to highlight
• Is extremely user friendly to update lists and documentation

• KPI (Key Performance Indicator)
• I think SAP Advanced Financial Closing does transparency well
• Walk me

Incentivized

• There are no areas to improve that I can think of. The team is always responsive and really open to my feedback and ideas which I love.

• In my opinion, SAP Advanced Financial Closing has room for improvement with Variants
• In my experience, Backend Customization has room for improvement in SAP Advanced Financial Closing

Incentivized

The date generated by the product is reliable, however it could be improved in terms of speed especially when it comes to high number of transaction data.

Incentivized

In the past, I have used FloQast and the UI was not as appealing as Numeric; nor was it nearly as intuitive. I think Numeric is better overall and works well for our team.

It enables faster and continuous close

Incentivized

• It has allowed us to stay smaller as a team as we can organize and check our work more efficiently
• A huge positive impact on letting stakeholders know where we are in the close process

• SAP Advanced Financial Closing has had a positive impact on our business

Incentivized