OctoPerf vs. OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OctoPerf
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OctoPerf is a load testing tool that is designed to use JMeter in an optimum way. The tool can be used to stress test websites, web apps or mobile apps. The solution enables users to design realistic virtual users without writing a single line of code.
$149
per month
LoadRunner Professional
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
Pricing
OctoPerfOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149
per month
Pro
$649
per month
Free
Free
On Demand
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OctoPerfLoadRunner Professional
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsBoth pay-per-test and subscriptions are available.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OctoPerfOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Considered Both Products
OctoPerf

No answer on this topic

LoadRunner Professional
Chose OpenText LoadRunner Professional
Most of the above tools are pretty popular in the industry. These are tools that are way cheaper compared to the industry giant LoadRunner. Yet these tools have their own limitations and drawbacks. In BlazeMeter the user load cannot be modified during the test run. JMeter and Bl…
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
OctoPerfOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
OctoPerf
9.4
1 Ratings
11% above category average
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
8.4
6 Ratings
0% below category average
End to end performance management10.01 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Integrated performance data9.01 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.01 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Real time monitoring9.01 Ratings6.15 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection10.01 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OctoPerfOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OctoPerfOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OctoPerfOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
OctoPerf
We used OctoPerf on Continuous Integrations and Continuous Deployment as part of load testing because it is very easy to load data on various frameworks and a wide range of validations can be done virtually. We can also design bespoke graphics and reports to aid in the validation of testing scenarios.
Read full review
OpenText
Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
Read full review
Pros
OctoPerf
  • Infrastructure for the cloud that is automated.
  • We have the ability to build real-time reports and dashboards.
Read full review
OpenText
  • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
  • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
  • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
Read full review
Cons
OctoPerf
  • The version of the runtime needs be upgraded.
  • Additional features should be included.
Read full review
OpenText
  • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
  • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
  • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
  • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
Read full review
Support Rating
OctoPerf
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OctoPerf
Unravel Data is a cloud optimization tool, whereas OctoPerf can be used to easily run load test cases and scenarios, as well as develop automated cloud infrastructure to generate customized reports on the test cases run. For the greatest possible user experience, we have some additional functionality such as Jmeter and other legacy tools.
Read full review
OpenText
HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OctoPerf
  • There is no need to know how to code.
  • Reports made to order.
Read full review
OpenText
  • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
  • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
Read full review
ScreenShots

OctoPerf Screenshots

Screenshot of Jellly is a full SaaS solution, from virtual user design, to test analysis. No installation is required, no need to write code. You can get performance metrics within a few minutes.Screenshot of Spend less time messing with IT management. We take care of spinning up machines around the world for your needs. This means more time for testing.Screenshot of Get insightful and comprehensive reports even while your test is running. Customize it to give stakeholders all required information to make the final decision.Screenshot of Jellly offers a friendly user interface that will help you create powerful and realistic load tests in a few minutes.