One Identity Defender vs. RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)

Frankly, it is suited both when someone is working from home or in office. There can be kids who would fiddle with the machine or in office, someone might do it knowingly or unknowingly. This added layer ensures that the user is a tad bit safer. The only problem is that, once you login, you don't get triggers for an entire day. I wish if they add a trigger after every hour or two. I know it would be annoying but at least my identity is secure.

RSA helped to have a reliable services for the 2FA authentication

• Fast to connect
• Easy to use
• Doesn't slow down my computer

Incentivized

• Used in conjunction with our Active Directory for 2-factor authentication
• The virtual RSA token for multiple devices makes it easy to avoid needing a physical device
• The ability to leverage real-time analytics to identify when step-up is required

Incentivized

• Remove the need to enter Windows password
• Sensitive to interruptions in internet connectivity

Incentivized

• The support for new LDAP version(389-DS)

Bomgar is much easier to set up & there is only one step when connecting while Defender takes a few steps.

Incentivized

Nothing as this point. At the end of 2019 we plan to start looking into alternatives

Incentivized

• Defender allows me to connect to the clients environment
• Without Defender I would not be able to support my client

Incentivized

• To be compliant with the Security Standards about the 2FA