Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) vs. Fortify by OpenText

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. MobSF support mobile app binaries (APK, IPA & APPX) along with zipped source code and provides REST APIs for integration with CI/CD or DevSecOps pipeline. The Dynamic Analyzer helps you to perform runtime security assessment and interactive instrumented testing.N/A
Fortify by OpenText
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
An AppSec solution formerly from Micro Focus, spanning SCA, SAST and DAST that supports the breadth and management of any application portfolio, used to secure code. Features API discovery and testing for any application, throughout the software lifecycle.N/A
Pricing
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Fortify by OpenText
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Fortify by OpenText
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Fortify by OpenText
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.5 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.5 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Fortify by OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Fortify by OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.
Read full review
OpenText
SDLC deployment is simple. simple to use The coverage is thorough and complete as a DAST product.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Scan for vulnerabilities
  • Scan for bad coding
  • Give suggestions on fixes for security issues
Read full review
OpenText
  • Detection of vulnerabilities
  • Scanning pipelines
  • Integration is super easy
  • Scanned cloud based applications
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • The UI is not that user friendly
  • The documentation could be easier to understand
  • An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated
Read full review
OpenText
  • Reporting could be better
  • Can be an involved setup if your organization is not using common build tools
  • Users get spammed with a lot of email updates from the service
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Since every firm needs to perform static code analysis on their applications, I believe Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect would work well for them (they also offer dynamic scanning, although I haven't used it myself). Different static analysis tools scan code in different ways, and Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect asks you to submit a complete build of the application along with debugging files. Depending on how your company builds its apps, this requirement may be simple or challenging.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Always receive excellent support from the vendor. No issues there.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.
Read full review
OpenText
Fortify Application Defender is a little more timely and upfront with a lot of their information on cyber security. we like what they provide and how they communicate with our users. I think they have a good understanding and practice in their field. they seem best suited for us and the best fit.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
  • We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
  • The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software
Read full review
OpenText
  • DevSecOps helped in reducing efforts
  • License cost was less
  • We could roll out double the count of applications with implementation of WebInspect
Read full review
ScreenShots