OpenText ALM/Quality Center vs. qmsWrapper
OpenText ALM/Quality Center vs. qmsWrapper
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A | |
qmsWrapper | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | qmsWrapper is an interconnected Quality Management Software for startups and small businesses. It helps all companies that want to increase productivity with ISO 9001:2015 and MedDev creators to achieve and manage ISO 13485:2016 and 21 CFR 820. Best for: 1. Companies who need guidance to implement and adopt validated QMS 2. Companies who want to automate their quality management and go beyond a paper-based system. A live demo is… | N/A |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | qmsWrapper | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | qmsWrapper | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
Top Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | qmsWrapper | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score 9.3 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | qmsWrapper | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 7.2 (31 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 3.0 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 7.4 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 1.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | qmsWrapper | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | OpenText | qmsWrapper No answers on this topic |
Pros | OpenText | qmsWrapper No answers on this topic |
Cons | OpenText | qmsWrapper No answers on this topic |
Likelihood to Renew | OpenText | qmsWrapper No answers on this topic |
Usability | OpenText | qmsWrapper No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | OpenText | qmsWrapper No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | OpenText | qmsWrapper No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | OpenText | qmsWrapper No answers on this topic |
ScreenShots | qmsWrapper Screenshots |