OpenText ALM/Quality Center vs. SimplerQMS
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
SimplerQMS | N/A | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | SimplerQMS offers a cloud-based Quality Management Software tailored to the needs of the Life Science industry. The QMS platform supports compliance with requirements such as FDA 21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex 11, GxP, cGMP, GAMP 5, GDPR, EU IVDR & EU MDR, ISO 13485:2016, 21 CFR Part 820, ICH Q10, and others. Various Life Science QMS modules are integrated, including Document Management, Change Management, Training Management, Supplier Management,… | $12,500 per year License |
| OpenText ALM/Quality Center | SimplerQMS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | All SimplerQMS modules and features are included in one subscription price. The total price varies depending on the number of licenses acquired. There are no extra fees for implementation, hosting, system validation, user training, ongoing support, or additional modules. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| OpenText ALM/Quality Center | SimplerQMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
83% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
80% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
83% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| OpenText ALM/Quality Center | SimplerQMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | PTC Windchill RV&S Score2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| OpenText ALM/Quality Center | SimplerQMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 3.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.4 | - |
| Ease of integration | 1.0 | - |
| OpenText ALM/Quality Center | SimplerQMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |



