Matrix Quality vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Matrix Quality | N/A | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | Matrix Quality (formerly Simploud) empowers life sciences and medtech organizations to streamline compliance, enhance collaboration, and accelerate innovation while maintaining strict regulatory rigor. It replaces fragmented spreadsheets and legacy systems with a single source of truth for all quality activities. Featuring pre-configured workflows and built-in dashboards, it provides real-time visibility into quality metrics, reducing validation efforts and ensuring audit readiness at a moment's… | $500 per month per user |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
| Matrix Quality | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Matrix Quality | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Matrix Quality | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | PTC Windchill RV&S Score2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Matrix Quality | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 3.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.4 |
| Ease of integration | - | 1.0 |
| Matrix Quality | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |



