TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Oracle Java Cloud

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A

    Java Cloud

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AOracle offers the Java Cloud Service, a PaaS supporting the fast and easy development of Java applications.

    $0.15

    Comparison Price (/vCPU)

    Pricing
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementJava Cloud
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Standard Edition
    $0.15485
    Comparison Price (/vCPU)
    Enterprise Edition
    $0.15485
    Comparison Price (/vCPU)
    High Performance Edition
    $0.3871
    Comparison Price (/vCPU)
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementJava Cloud
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementJava Cloud
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    GraalVM
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Oracle Java SE
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    GraalVM
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementJava Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementJava Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Oracle Java Cloud is especially appropriate for moderate to complex Java applications. Due to BYOL licensing, it is also works well when you are planning to do dev and test in-house and then deploy it on Oracle Java Cloud. It is not well suited for simple Java applications due to the cost of Oracle Java Cloud. Simple applications don't need the fully managed aspect of Oracle Java Cloud.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Integration with development tools
    • Auto scale
    • Enhanced security
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Pricing can certainly be improved as the cost adds up for dev/test environments using the Oracle Java Cloud platform.
    • It is hard to customize Oracle Java Cloud for complex Java applications requiring high bandwidth memory and network requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    We selected Oracle Java Cloud for its native integration with other Oracle solutions and its focus on Java applications. Overall, our experience with Oracle Java Cloud has been positive, as it has improved our efficiency, security, and scalability in developing cloud applications.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Positive impact on ROI by reducing the time to deploy Java applications in the cloud.
    • Positive impact on business objectives by reducing the CapEx needed to hire staff to deploy and then later maintain the Java instances.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots