TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Public Cloud

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A

    Public Cloud

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPublic Cloud
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPublic Cloud
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPublic Cloud
    Cloud Management
    Comparison of Cloud Management features of OpenText Application Quality Management and Public Cloud
    Feature
    OpenText Application Quality Management
    -
    Ratings
    Public Cloud
    8.6
    1 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Cloud Management Security00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Automation and Orchestration00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
    Cost Management00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Cloud Management Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Governance and Compliance00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Resource Management00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Systems Integration00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPublic Cloud
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Rackspace Fabric
    Score6.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    IBM Turbonomic
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    IBM Turbonomic
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPublic Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPublic Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infomaniak Network
    Best suited for environments where there are standard processes and no scope for customization and not suitable for industries where the business processes are dynamic and prone to changes frequently. Also, where the users are already experienced or users of SAP would help to easily help to adopt the cloud approach.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infomaniak Network
    • Scalability
    • Cost Savings
    • Increased Flexibility
    • Improved Safety
    • Ease of Data migration with the help of migration cockpit
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infomaniak Network
    • Additional processes
    • Better UI
    • Access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infomaniak Network
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infomaniak Network
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Infomaniak Network
    • Less infrastructure
    • Quick and easy
    • Post-go-live maintenance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots