OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Microsoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Application Quality Management
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Replacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Visual SourceSafe is a discontinued source control software offering, from Microsoft.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Application Quality ManagementMicrosoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementMicrosoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Application Quality ManagementMicrosoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Considered Both Products
OpenText Application Quality Management
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools …
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
Accurev was in place when I was hired. We keep it for big projects. For small ones we use svn.
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
Git is one obvious alternative. However, Git is leveraging the command line and has minimal interface. Developer must be acclimated with command line in order to use Git.
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Chose Microsoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Azure DevOps is a much better, more modern tool that Visual SourceSafe and everyone should be moving to it. Most if not all the integration that is there can be done or emulated in it.
Chose Microsoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
We selected Microsoft Visual SourceSafe because at the time none of these other products were out there. Now we are trying to migrate all our legacy code from Visual SourceSafe to Azure DevOps. Unfortunately we don't have a value proposition for some of the older products so …
Chose Microsoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Git is a much more elaborated tool for file versioning than Visual SourceSafe. It has superior performance and stability, it is cross-platform, distributed, it gives you a better User Interface (if you choose to buy Bitbucket), it allows you to have big projects with big teams, …
Best Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality ManagementMicrosoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementMicrosoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
3.8
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Application Quality ManagementMicrosoft Visual SourceSafe (Discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
This is one of the best version control tools I have used.
Read full review
The only time I could recommend Microsoft Visual SourceSafe would be for a beginner who has a small amount of code that they would like to keep track of. This solution would not be recommended for an enterprise or any shop where you have multiple developers working on the same solution.
Read full review
Pros
  • Creation of streams & workspaces are easy.
  • Easy integration with other bug tracking or tasking tools like JIRA.
  • File comparison and history is possible.
  • Project creation and setup is easy.
Read full review
  • avoid losing code
  • versioning of previous projects
  • saving versions on db
Read full review
Cons
  • The tool allows duplicate file name, if both are present in different directories. This creates confusion if multiple people are working on the same file. It should at least produce a warning.
Read full review
  • Becoming corrupt and having to be rebuild from a previous version.
  • It can be extremely slow to check in & out of.
  • Lost support several years ago from Microsoft.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I give it this rating because I found an alternate application that is much more cost effective and quicker
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
Overall Microsoft Visual Source Safe is very easy to use. It is a simple application that does only one thing. It has the basic windows tree structure for listing projects and solutions. There is no way to search for a particular file, project or solution. There is also no way to search the code in the files.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
There is no longer support for Visual SourceSafe as I believe it's been retired. There are, however, users that still use the tool and they do help if there are questions or complaints.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
Azure DevOps is a much better, more modern tool that Visual SourceSafe and everyone should be moving to it. Most if not all the integration that is there can be done or emulated in it
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Quick merging.
  • Easy to roll back changes.
  • Good tree view.
Read full review
  • When we started using it, it allowed us to do source code versioning and store the code in a centralized location and not locally.
  • We are using it for very few projects with few developers that still maintain those applications and do not have time to merge the source code to Git.
Read full review
ScreenShots