TrustRadius

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Yarn

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Application Quality Management
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Replacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A
Yarn
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Yarn is a package manager for JavaScript designed to provide secure dependency management, with project manager features such as offering a workspace that allows users to split projects into sub-components within a single repository. Developed by personnel at Facebook, Yarn is free and open source and associated to no company.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Application Quality ManagementYarn
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementYarn
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Application Quality ManagementYarn
Considered Both Products
OpenText Application Quality Management
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools …
Jason Vroustouris | TrustRadius Reviewer
Jason Vroustouris
Lead Java Developer
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
Accurev was in place when I was hired. We keep it for big projects. For small ones we use svn.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
Git is one obvious alternative. However, Git is leveraging the command line and has minimal interface. Developer must be acclimated with command line in order to use Git.
Yarn
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Yarn
Compared to NPM, Yarn is a clear winner here. NPM does not look to be getting any improvements recently. And it's much much slower to run when installing project dependencies. This has a clear impact on the developer productivity but also makes deployments slower. So Yarn is …
Best Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality ManagementYarn
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementYarn
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Application Quality ManagementYarn
Likelihood to Recommend
This is one of the best version control tools I have used.
Nishant Bilaiya | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nishant Bilaiya
Senior Consultant
Read full review
There is really no real reason why not to use Yarn today. It's much faster than npm, and you will need a dependency management system anyway. The only thing that might be missing is the fact that it doesn't come natively with NodeJS, and you have to install it yourself. I'd like to see the NodeJS ecosystem include Yarn by default.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
  • Creation of streams & workspaces are easy.
  • Easy integration with other bug tracking or tasking tools like JIRA.
  • File comparison and history is possible.
  • Project creation and setup is easy.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Package management
  • Speed of download compared to npm
  • Moduel version control
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
  • The tool allows duplicate file name, if both are present in different directories. This creates confusion if multiple people are working on the same file. It should at least produce a warning.
Nishant Bilaiya | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nishant Bilaiya
Senior Consultant
Read full review
  • Rarely, some server connection error appear, while npm works alright.
  • Sometimes, deleting the whole vendor directory is the best solution to solve weird issues.
  • You still might need npm to install Yarn.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I give it this rating because I found an alternate application that is much more cost effective and quicker
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Compared to npm, Yarn is a clear winner here. npm does not look to be getting any improvements recently. And it's much much slower to run when installing project dependencies. This has a clear impact on the developer productivity but also makes deployments slower. So Yarn is still a much superior choice.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Quick merging.
  • Easy to roll back changes.
  • Good tree view.
Jason Vroustouris | TrustRadius Reviewer
Jason Vroustouris
Lead Java Developer
Read full review
  • Deployments happen much faster.
  • Building and testing our apps is much more streamlined and efficient.
  • Makes it easier to write reusable code.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots