OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. TrueProject

For Project Management, Micro Focus PPM includes all most every feature you need. You can manage your projects using work plans, project health, resource assignments, actuals, and costs. Additionally, you can get required approvals with workflows like sponsor approval or CR approvals. However, at project costing we need to make customizations due to lack of several outsource costs on it.

Typical project management tools provide you with trailing information that is not forthcoming on impending problems until it’s too late. Only TrueProject predicts and alerts you of problems while there is still time to solve them. It's time to start managing projects through a heads-up display.

Incentivized

• Easy to manage tasks among project's stakeholders
• Satifying resource management capabilities
• Complete dashboard (fully customizable screens and integrations)

Incentivized

• Predict project problems in advance
• Protects our organization from costly project failure
• Confirms best practices compliance, identifies non-productive activities, and predicts project risks while there is time to act.

Incentivized

• User Interface needs lot of improvement
• Too many clicks required to do the job
• Report creation is horrible

Incentivized

• Use of generative AI

Incentivized

We have many business processes using it along with our project management staff.

Incentivized

GUI needs to be enhanced for today's technical and agile development requirements. It is very cumbersome and out-dated (at some pages)

Incentivized

We have a Change Management Team for internal support of Micro Focus PPM. So, they give close and quick support to our problems. They contact product support when it is necessary. They regularly upgrade the product. Generally, I can say that there is a good support for this product.

Have your methodology defined prior to the vendor coming on board to start any configuration changes.

Incentivized

The vision of supporting DevOps, complementary functionalities with other software products of Micro Focus, native support for agile/waterfall methodologies made Micro Focus to be evaluated as more valuable against other PPM products. The complementary functionality with the other enterprise software products of Micro Focus (ALM, ITSM family etc) especially had a major effect on the selection.

Incentivized

• More Streamlined
• Leadership is very informed now

Incentivized

• Saved millions of dollars that would have been lost to failed or challenged technology projects.

Incentivized