OpenText UFT One vs. Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText UFT One
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Unified Functional Testing (UFT, formerly known as HP UFT and before that QuickTest Professional or HP QTP) is a functional and performance testing tool acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, now from OpenText.N/A
Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis' solution for testing ServiceNow workflows, Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow, is a scoped application within the user's Now Platform, boasting a familiar interface equipped with a centralized dashboard to view test plans, suites, cases, and results.
$1,200
Pricing
OpenText UFT OneTricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText UFT OneTricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText UFT OneTricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
Features
OpenText UFT OneTricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
OpenText UFT One
-
Ratings
Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
8.2
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Record and Automate00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Mobile Testing00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Test Scheduling00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Test Management00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Integrated Version Control00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Parallel Testing00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Object Recognition00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Testing Collaboration00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Real Device Testing00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText UFT OneTricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText UFT OneTricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(12 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText UFT OneTricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
UFT is well suited if the price is not an issue, and if the requirement is about testing different technologies. If the application is based on Legacy platforms like Siebel or Mainframe, UFT fares quite well. For low cost web-based projects, there are other cheap and open source tools available. If it is about API testing or Mobile Testing, it is better to use other tools like TOSCA.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
If anyone need an automation and testing tool, Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow is one of best application for this demand. It has user friendly interface. Also easy to use and even non technical colleagues can use it. It has support for some applications especially AI integration really exciting. And it can work cloudbased.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • The simple front end will allow novice users to easily grasp the basics of automation and give them confidence to try things for themselves.
  • UFT can scale up and run across multiple machines from a single controller, such as ALM, enabling hundreds of tests to be executed overnight.
  • There is an active support community out there, both official HPE based and independent users. This means if you do encounter a problem there is always someone out there to help you.
  • The later versions have many add-ins to plug in to other tools within the QA world.
  • Expert users are able to utilise the many native functions and also build their own to get the most out of the tool and impress people as they walk past and see the magic happening on the screen.
  • UFT also has LeanFT bundled with it, allowing automated testing at the api level - if you can convince the developers to let you in there.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Easy to use
  • User friendly interface
  • Can work on cloudbased
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • Its licensing cost is very high making it a very expensive tool. due to this many organisations are exploring options of license free tools like Selenium for automation. Though learning curve is large in case of Selenium but it is very cost effective & you an get lot of support online for Selenium.
  • Though the scripting time is less since its easy to create automation scripts, the execution time is relatively higher as it takes the lot of CPU & RAM.
  • Though UFT is quite stable but during long execution cycles we do get frequent browser crashing issues.
  • In terms of costing TestComplete is also one option which is not free but comes with modular pricing. You can buy what you need, when you need.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • It should support more functions
  • Pricing should be less
  • Hard to set up
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
The ui is clean but there are lots of setting snd options which one must be fully aware so it will aid him/her during scripting
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
HPE are quick to reply and it's possible to get through to the actual developers shuold the case warrent it. Their online system allows updates and tracking of all incedents raised.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
1. It works solid for automate SAP and S/4 Hana applications and Fiori too. 2. Teams are well versed about UFT One 3. Able to handle maintained execution results 4. Publish Automation execution results in well manner to the leadership team/stake holders 5. More help content available 6. Able to understand non technical resources about normal view.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • Reduces the total workload of keeping the team to test older (regression) functionality. QA testers can concentrate on ad-hoc and exploratory testing, saving time and effort across the entire project.
  • Has built a better infrastructure for the client applications on which we can rely on for stability and providing regression results for any new features being developed.
  • Led the applications a step closer to implementing agile practices and DevOps across the entire organization. Thus, providing a better turnaround time of new features to the customers and less maintenance headaches for the BAU team to address.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Pros: Decrease our effort time to testing
  • Pros: Support many platforms on testing
  • Cons: It is really hard to set up
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued) Screenshots

Screenshot of Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow is a scoped application within the Now Platform. It is equipped with a centralized dashboard to view test plans, suites, cases, and results. Reports with pass/fail, screenshots, and result files, to find what is needed in the ServiceNow environment.Screenshot of Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow’s test on demand. The developer’s console is used to playback tests in real time and locally on a desktop.Screenshot of The Case Creator generates test cases based off ServiceNow configuration changes. It generates cases for business rules, UI policies, UI actions, and tables. Case Creator can generate test cases for net new functionality, and be used to maintain existing test cases when there are changes to the configuration.Screenshot of The point-and-click Recorder is used to generate test cases from user actions. It’s also Service Portal compatible. The Recorder is used to translate test steps into lay terms.Screenshot of Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow includes a log, screenshot, and video capture with every execution. Line errors are defined for easier debugging. If a visual is preferred, a video recording of the execution can be viewed, to watch the behavior of the test execution.