OpenVPN Access Server vs. ThreatLocker
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenVPN Access Server | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | OpenVPN headquartered in Pleasanton allows users to create secure access to a private network in the cloud or on-premise with Access Server. Access Server is available to deploy directly on various cloud platforms like Amazon AWS, Google GCP, Microsoft Azure, DigitalOcean, and also available as ready-to-deploy virtual appliances for Microsoft HyperV and VMWare ESXi. Alternately, OpenVPN Access Server Virtual Appliance is a full-featured secure network tunneling VPN virtual appliance solution… | $27 per month 3 connections (minimum) |
ThreatLocker | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | ThreatLocker Inc. is a security platform used to stop misuse and vulnerable software as well as control application elevation, storage and network traffic. | N/A |
| OpenVPN Access Server | ThreatLocker | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | More connections reduces cost per connection, as does going with an annual plan versus a monthly price. | Contact vendor for pricing information. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| OpenVPN Access Server | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 10 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | |
| OpenVPN Access Server | ThreatLocker | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Private Network |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OpenVPN Access Server | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| OpenVPN Access Server | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.5 | 9.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 8.7 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| In-Person Training | - | 10.0 |
| Online Training | - | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 10.0 |
| OpenVPN Access Server | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| In-Person Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | OpenVPN Access Server Screenshots | ThreatLocker Screenshots |







