Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting vs. SingleStore

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is designed to help database customers improve security, accelerate compliance, and reduce IT costs by sanitizing copies of production data for testing, development, and other activities and by discarding unnecessary data.N/A
SingleStore
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
SingleStore aims to deliver the world’s fastest distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications: SingleStoreDB, which combines transactional + analytical workloads in a single platform.
$0.69
per hour
Pricing
Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingSingleStore
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
OnDemand
$0.69
per hour
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingSingleStore
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingSingleStore
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingSingleStore
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Delphix
Delphix
Score 8.9 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingSingleStore
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.3
(54 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(7 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(28 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingSingleStore
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
The tool is excellent when you need to provide all the details about your clients, yet hide their identity - all while maintaining the referential integrity of the data (so child-records of the masked parent record and maintain the same fake ID of the parent).
Read full review
SingleStore
Business analytics is one of the areas where SingleStore really helped. As we implemented BI platforms, the previous DB would bog down so bad that it negatively affected our online products. Moving to SingleStore made a huge difference. General performance is amazing. We gained speed in areas we were not even expecting to the point we had to slow down or put rate limits in place to avoid duplications - something completely unexpected. The hosted service is great. We no longer have to worry about maintenance, db infrastructure or system updates which saves a significant amount of time for the IT team.
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • It offers several ways in which you can mask your data; for example, you can choose to replace all names with "real fake names", or choose to replace all SSNs with existing SSNs, but randomly assigned. You control the algorithm.
  • It works on non-Oracle databases as well (in our case, we use it for both Oracle and SQL/Server).
  • The overhead is minimal (it doesn't take long to run, and it doesn't consume too many system resources.
Read full review
SingleStore
  • Technical support is stellar -- far above and beyond anything I've experienced with any other company.
  • When we compared SingleStore to other databases two years ago, we found SingleStore performance to be far superior.
  • Pipeline data ingestion is exceptionally fast.
  • The ability to combine transactional and analytical workloads without compromising performance is very impressive.
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • The learning curve was not trivial - but we got through it.
  • Cost - this product is not cheap.
Read full review
SingleStore
  • We wish the product had better support for High Availability of the aggregator. Currently the indexes generated by the two different aggregators are not in the same sequential space and so our apps have more burden to deal with HA.
  • More tools for debugging issues such as high memory usage would be good.
  • The price was the one that kept us away from purchasing for the first few years. Now we are able to afford due to a promotion that gives it at 25% of the list price. Not sure if we'll continue after the promotion offer expires in another 2 years.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
We haven't seen a faster relation database. Period. Which is why we are super happy customers and will for sure renew our license.
Read full review
Usability
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
[Until it is] supported on AWS ECS containers, I will reserve a higher rating for SingleStore. Right now it works well on EC2 and serves our current purpose, [but] would look forward to seeing SingleStore respond to our urge of feature in a shorter time period with high quality and security.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
We have not experienced any downtime in the two years that we have been using SingleStore.
Read full review
Performance
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
We give SingleStore the top score here given how performant it has been for us. We have used their self-managed option since day 1 which is now over 2 years ago. We are running 100’s of millions of requests per month, performing queries across billions of records and the self-managed option has continued to hold up well for us without any need to move to their paid offering.
Read full review
Support Rating
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
Very responsive to trouble tickets - Often, I think, the SingleStore's monitoring systems have already alerted the engineers by the time I get around to writing a ticket (about 10 - 20 mins after we see a problem). I feel like things are escalated nicely and SingleStore takes resolving trouble tickets seriously. Also SingleStore follows up after incidents to with a post mortem and actionable takaways to improve the product. Very satisfied here.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
We allowed 2-3 months for a thorough evaluation. We saw pretty quickly that we were likely to pick SingleStore, so we ported some of our stored procedures to SingleStore in order to take a deeper look. Two SingleStore people worked closely with us to ensure that we did not have any blocking problems. It all went remarkably smoothly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
We also looked at Delphix: the tool was quite powerful, easy to use, and competitive from a cost standpoint. However, since our entire data warehouse environment is built on the Oracle technology stack, it made sense to us to use the Oracle product here, as it integrates very well with other Oracle database and ETL products.
Read full review
SingleStore
We've tried both these above, to solve ingestion and analytical queries. Dynamo was a perfect ingestion service, but it didn't allow us to run intense analytical queries. Aurora helped us run these analytical queries, and ingestion was reasonable, BUT the queries were simply too slow. SingleStore has provided a solution to essentially allow us to take these two tools, and turn them into 1.
Read full review
Scalability
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
We needed more memory on our cluster. SingleStore handled it very smoothly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • We have many compliance regulations we need to adhere to. Without this tool, we were always taking a risk of exposing client information, and get penalized by the State of the Feds (the financial consequences are significant).
  • So while the tool doesn't save us money directly, it greatly reduces the risk we had been taking all these years. To some degree, this is much like an insurance policy.
  • Given the above, it also allows us to share information with other departments/agencies, in situations where before we simply couldn't take the risk of exposing client information.
Read full review
SingleStore
  • As the overall performance and functionality were expanded, we are able to deliver our data much faster than before, which increases the demand for data.
  • Metadata is available in the platform by default, like metadata on the pipelines. Also, the information schema has lots of metadata, making it easy to load our assets to the data catalog.
Read full review
ScreenShots