TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. SiteCapture

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle Primavera

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AOracle’s Primavera is a software suite designed for construction and other asset-intensive industries. It contains a variety of project planning, management, and execution components for buyers to select from.N/A

    SiteCapture

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ASiteCapture is a mobile and cloud solution that transforms how businesses capture and communicate information from the field. SiteCapture lets companies that rely heavily on remote workers replace inefficient processes with a single, easy-to-use mobile solution that improves workforce productivity, streamlines operations, and improves levels of customer service. SiteCapture can be configured for virtually any field data collection task and integrated into existing back-office systems.

    $130

    per month (for 4 users)

    Pricing
    Oracle PrimaveraSiteCapture
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic
    $130
    per month 4 users
    Professional
    $375
    per month 10 users
    Premium
    $850
    per month includes 20 users
    Custom
    Contact Sales
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle PrimaveraSiteCapture
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Discount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Oracle PrimaveraSiteCapture
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Kickserv
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Microsoft Project Server
    Score5.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Planview PPM Pro
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Oracle PrimaveraSiteCapture
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (12 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle PrimaveraSiteCapture
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a utilitarian product of a yesteryear gone by. It's straightforward and to the point. It is well suited for a customer base who is not interested in frills, portability, or a multitude of OOTB ability. It's for those who like to restrict and manage all control over users, code in queries, functions, and create customized reports for end users. It does what it does very well however, just do not expect it to be pretty. It's a 2007 product, so curb your excitement. It does handle all aspects of portfolio management well; financials, budgeting, spend plans, contracts, projects, staffing, workflows, etc... however, it is not intuitive to navigate, and will require some training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SiteCapture
    Any scenario where you are managing off-site work tasks, especially if those work tasks involve virtual verification and media.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Primavera as a scheduling software can manage large project schedules regardless of complexity.
    • P6 is powerful enough to identify the longest pathway to the completion of a project. This is also known as CPM.
    • P6 can handle multiple scenarios and save them as a separate baseline schedule. This can be helpful for figuring theoretical sequences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SiteCapture
    • Creating products that are highly configurable for the user.
    • Creating API integrations.
    • Understanding and adapting to mobile user needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • The software is high end with rich features, hence its rich price.
    • There is room for improvement in their customer service.
    • Oracle is doing its best in coming up with new features, and has a planned roadmap. It would be good if the enhancements are delivered faster.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SiteCapture
    • Industry/market specification.
    • Expansion and scale.
    • Look and design.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    Is easy to use but the the interface should be more nice and contemporary
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SiteCapture
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    Oracle is better laid out and has more functionality as well as end-user flow. The login process, billing, and construction management features are easy to find, easy to use, and helpful. The limitations on Quickbooks restrict users from the ability to view and bill full contracts if broken down, to track and show % complete. Procore is confusing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SiteCapture
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • P6 is critical to the execution of all of our projects. Without it we would have less control of our projects.
    • One of our key business objectives is to deliver projects on time or ahead of schedule. P6 supports us in this goal and allows our superintendents to manage complicated construction projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SiteCapture
    • Reduced our labor spend due to integration and automation.
    • Reduced subcontracting burdens due to advanced mobile features (i.e., eliminated the need for homework, uploading, and transcription after job completion).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    SiteCapture Screenshots

    Screenshot of Customer Remote Self-InspectionsScreenshot of Work Order ManagementScreenshot of Photo & Data ManagementScreenshot of ReportingScreenshot of EstimatingScreenshot of Inspections