TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management (MDM) vs. Petrel E&P

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management (MDM)

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOracle supplies a suite of utilities management applications, including the Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management (MDM) application.N/A

    Petrel E&P

    Score6 out of 10
    N/APetrel E&P, from Schlumberger, is a modular suite of applications designed to support exploratory geological study and geological modeling, with features such as data visualization, and other model building tools.N/A
    Pricing
    Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management (MDM)Petrel E&P
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management (MDM)Petrel E&P
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management (MDM)Petrel E&P
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.8
    (4 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    4.8
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management (MDM)Petrel E&P
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    Oracle Utilities MDM is well suited for users that have plenty of money to invest in technical hardware resources to support the requirements of this application. With the electric utility industry becoming more and more precise data-wise, the requirements for data storage and processing are only going to increase. For example, electrical usage measurement used to be a once-a-month practice; in the 1990s, hourly reading was introduced; recently, 15-minute interval readings have been introduced and will become the new norm. Going from one reading a month, to 720, to now 2,880 requires expensive hardware. MDM is able to handle this load, in our experience, only if you purchase Oracle's Exadata hardware, which is priced at a premium. Beyond data storage itself, we have also found that MDM real-time usage for users is also, unfortunately, best with Exadata. Likely because Oracle developed this hardware, and because it has built-in compression, portioning, and tuning features, performance is better. One note is that Oracle does provide a purge-and-archive strategy in the more recent versions of MDM (i.e. ILM). However, implementation of this is a small project in itself, although worthwhile in the long run.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    Petrel is an extremely powerful tool and for geological 3D modeling is the go-to tool, it's Sequential Indicator Simulations, Object-Based modeling or multiple point statistics modeling workflows are top notches and I highly advise its use. I wouldn't recommend using it for seismic interpretation based on seismic attributes since it can be a little bit limited in this aspect.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Data Management is crucial and MDM does this well
    • Device Configuration organization
    • Readings, usage, measurement units, service points, device management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    • Petrel handles multiple coordinate systems better than competitors.
    • The object tree organization in Petrel is intuitive and user-friendly.
    • Easy to handle data across multiple UTM zones by allowing geodesic coordinates.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • In some ways, MDM is too customizable. There is a delicate balance to be struck between allowing implementers the ability to create custom algorithms to meet their business needs and making those features part of the base product. Lots of things can go wrong if you customize it too much.
    • The cost/time to upgrade is very high.
    • Cost of ownership is very high.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    • Petrel is extremely expensive, working with it in a small company is almost impossible. This shouldn't be an issue for a large company or for a big university with a large budget for investigation.
    • Since it has so many functions it can be overwhelming once you begin using it, so I highly recommend to pay for a Schlumberger instructor.
    • The seismic attributes could be improved since they are not entirely accurate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    We get prompt responses from support, but sometimes solutions take weeks or even months to come.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    Although I have minimal experience with meter data management products outside of MDM, it does perform better than an in-house product developed by our utility 20 years ago for use on our mainframe-based system then. Meter management is headed the same way as other industries in terms of data usage and mining. The requirement for data is only going to continue to increase, and at this time it appears that MDM is only just keeping up with those requirements. Oracle has done a great job of purchasing products and integrating them into their overall framework, but the current database structure of MDM lends itself to poor performance if Oracle's own hardware is not purchased, and if their purge and archive strategy (i.e. ILM) is not employed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    I use Petrel and competitor products for different functions. If I didn't have Petrel, it would be a lot more difficult to work with my aerially extensive dataset and manipulate my data with geographic coordinates.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • Preventing errors for us always turns into money saved. Error flags that MDM throws help to prevent incorrect data entry, which almost always turns into money and time spent on sending somebody out into the field to ensure accurate data was given. So by not allowing for the possible errors, we save money.
    • No Negative Impacts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    • Working at the University of Oklahoma the investment is well paid since geoscientist are formed with the best tool available.
    • Keeping in mind that the software is really expensive, for the product to have an economic positive impact the project's revenue has to be large.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots