OSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA vs. Petrel E&P

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
OSIsoft developed the PI System, a data integration and analytics platform designed to support plant and utilities with operational intelligence and analytics. OSIsoft was acquired by AVEVA in March 2021, and is now an AVEVA brand and solution.N/A
Petrel E&P
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Petrel E&P, from Schlumberger, is a modular suite of applications designed to support exploratory geological study and geological modeling, with features such as data visualization, and other model building tools.N/A
Pricing
OSIsoft PI System, from AVEVAPetrel E&P
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OSIsoft PI System, from AVEVAPetrel E&P
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
User Ratings
OSIsoft PI System, from AVEVAPetrel E&P
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OSIsoft PI System, from AVEVAPetrel E&P
Likelihood to Recommend
AVEVA
If you have many different DCSs or PLCs in your manufacturing plant, OSIsoft PI System does the job quite well to integrate all different types of sources and data. We have Yokogawa, Mitsubishi, Hitachi, and Azbil DCS and PLC. Connecting them is not a problem.
Read full review
Schlumberger
Petrel is an extremely powerful tool and for geological 3D modeling is the go-to tool, it's Sequential Indicator Simulations, Object-Based modeling or multiple point statistics modeling workflows are top notches and I highly advise its use. I wouldn't recommend using it for seismic interpretation based on seismic attributes since it can be a little bit limited in this aspect.
Read full review
Pros
AVEVA
  • Ability to integrate with many 3rd-party systems, 70 sources as per their marketing claims
  • Great for big data management
Read full review
Schlumberger
  • Petrel handles multiple coordinate systems better than competitors.
  • The object tree organization in Petrel is intuitive and user-friendly.
  • Easy to handle data across multiple UTM zones by allowing geodesic coordinates.
Read full review
Cons
AVEVA
  • Missing some features and has some bugs
Read full review
Schlumberger
  • Petrel is extremely expensive, working with it in a small company is almost impossible. This shouldn't be an issue for a large company or for a big university with a large budget for investigation.
  • Since it has so many functions it can be overwhelming once you begin using it, so I highly recommend to pay for a Schlumberger instructor.
  • The seismic attributes could be improved since they are not entirely accurate.
Read full review
Support Rating
AVEVA
Good local support. The only issue is that there are not many system integrators that are well versed with OSIsoft. The implementation is also very costly.
Read full review
Schlumberger
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
AVEVA
No answers on this topic
Schlumberger
I use Petrel and competitor products for different functions. If I didn't have Petrel, it would be a lot more difficult to work with my aerially extensive dataset and manipulate my data with geographic coordinates.
Read full review
Return on Investment
AVEVA
  • Real-time data
  • We don't require constant updates during crisis from a technician who usually will update to BCP team via WhatsApp.
Read full review
Schlumberger
  • Working at the University of Oklahoma the investment is well paid since geoscientist are formed with the best tool available.
  • Keeping in mind that the software is really expensive, for the product to have an economic positive impact the project's revenue has to be large.
Read full review
ScreenShots