Penny Software vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Penny Software | Score7 out of 10 | N/A | Cloud-based E-Source / Procure-To-Pay system that automates RFQs/RFPs, provide comparison and analysis. and push to maximizing savings. Penny can be used to cover the procurement cycle partially or completely. From request > processing internal approvals > dispatching RFQs/RFPs > gathering quotations/proposals > sending POs > receiving materials (GRN) > billing > payment. All steps are automated in a storyline without a need to disconnect at any stage. | $50,000 per year |
Zip Intake-to-Procure | Score7.9 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private. | N/A |
| Penny Software | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Penny Software | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 22 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 17 Answers | |
| Penny Software | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Precoro Score9.5 out of 10 | Precoro Score9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | GEP Quantum Intelligence Score9.1 out of 10 | GEP Quantum Intelligence Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Penny Software | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 7.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Penny Software | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Penny Software Screenshots | Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots |









