TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Percona Operator

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AThe Percona Kubernetes Operator for Percona XtraDB Cluster or Percona Server for MongoDB automates the creation, alteration, or deletion of members in a Percona XtraDB Cluster or Percona Server for MongoDB environment. It can be used to instantiate a new Percona XtraDB Cluster or Percona Server for MongoDB replica set, or to scale an existing environment. The Operator contains all necessary Kubernetes settings to provide a proper and consistent Percona XtraDB Cluster or Percona Server for…N/A

    Podman

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/APodman is a daemonless container engine for developing, managing, and running OCI Containers on Linux Systems. Containers can either be run as root or in rootless mode. Podman is open source and free, supported and maintained by the Containers organization, with code available from GitHub.N/A
    Pricing
    Percona OperatorPodman
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Percona OperatorPodman
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsFree and open-source—
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Percona OperatorPodman
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Percona Operator and Podman.io
    Feature
    Percona Operator
    -
    Ratings
    Podman.io
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Security and Isolation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Percona OperatorPodman
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Percona OperatorPodman
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Percona OperatorPodman
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Percona
    Production ready, robust DB solution built for Kubernetes envs, we was able, for the first time, to ship production db workloads inside k8s. Be sure to check differences with "traditional" MySQL and other clustering solutions. Also be sure to match it with proper k8s storage solutions.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    While it always depends on your use case, I believe security concerns of need for root user is a concern, so it is worth considering daemonless container service over Docker, which works just as good and has support for docker compose. Another good reason is the licensing for enterprise usage, which podman has no restrictions for. It’s also a great choice for OpenShift integration, which is seamless and works well with Rancher as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Percona
    • Easy and fast deployment.
    • A reliable, fully automated, high-available db lifecycle management solution.
    • Exaustive documentation.
    • Production ready.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • It’s daemonless, so somewhat more secure.
    • It works exceptionally well and is compatible with Docker compose
    • Podman Desktop actually makes individual usage also pretty easy.
    • It can be used as Docker alternative with almost no additional steps
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Percona
    • Some differences compared to "traditional" MySQL solution.
    • Had some hard times trying to use it combined with pre-existing techs like WordPress, Magento, etc.
    • The specific k8s environment features can have an impact on it, like the storage solutions offered by the cloud vendor.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Podman desktop is getting more stable with each version, but does need more UX friendliness as well.
    • Official support for development tools and IDEs is missing for most tools
    • It works well with Kubernetes, but I wouldn’t mind additional improvements
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Percona
    Easy and fast deployment. A reliable, fully automated, high-available db lifecycle management solution. It requires a bit of learning time for people new to operators ecosystem.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Percona
    Well documented, there was no need to contact support.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Percona
    For a long time we struggled finding a viable solution to migrate our existing db workloads inside Kubernetes. Before "operators era" proper db workloads required manual management, of course that easily raised administrative overhead. Then the future started to be brighter with the introduction of operators and the "official" Oracle's MySQL Operator, then Presslab's one, finally Percona's operator. Compared to other operators, the last one allowed us to ship production db workloads inside k8s.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Podman is Daemonless, lightweight and doesn’t charge us for commercial usage, so it’s a relief for startups. Minikube and Rancher are a bit more complex for our use cases; so we keep things simple, fast and secure with Podman that can easily be managed with Podman Desktop and other works with our docker-compose based projects without issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Percona
    • It allowed us to use k8s on our entire infrastructure.
    • Decreased administrative overhead around our db services.
    • As it is an open source technology, it cut down our db pricings.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • We definitely feel more secure.
    • We do not suffer from memory or cpu overuses as it uses fedora coreOS which is lightweight
    • We do not have to worry about license payments for our basic usages.
    • It’s open source so quick fixes imminent with maximum transparency.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots