PingSafe vs. Qualys TruRisk Platform
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PingSafe | Score9.8 out of 10 | N/A | PingSafe is a Cloud Security platform with knowledge of the attackers’ modus operandi. PingSafe helps businesses across various sizes and verticals transform cloud security and eliminate all hidden and exploitable vulnerabilities at blazing-fast speed and scale. It does this by scanning the user's cloud infrastructure from an attacker's lens. The security lapses are identified, prioritized, and auto-remediated to eliminate unwanted business impacts. | N/A |
Qualys TruRisk Platform | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys TruRisk Platform (formerly Qualys Cloud Platform, or Qualysguard), from San Francisco-based Qualys, is network security and vulnerability management software featuring app scanning and security, network device mapping and detection, vulnerability prioritization schedule and remediation, and other features to provide vulnerability management and network attack surface reduction. | N/A |
| PingSafe | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| PingSafe | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 85% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 87% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 85% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| PingSafe | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PingSafe | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Microsoft Defender for Cloud Score8.7 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| PingSafe | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.6 |
| Usability | - | 2.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 5.0 |
| PingSafe | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |

