Planview Portfolios vs. Structure by Tempo
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Planview Portfolios | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Planview Portfolios is an end-to-end project portfolio management and enterprise architecture management tool. It includes two components: Portfolio and Resource Management and Capability and Technology Management. The platform is available as a cloud-based or on-premise service. | N/A |
Structure by Tempo | N/A | N/A | Structure for Jira, based on technology acquired by Tempo with ALM Works, is a ppm tool that enables users to visualize multiple Jira projects, programs, and portfolios in one place, so as to align execution with strategy. Structure’s hierarchies and spreadsheet-like views help users control their entire portfolio. It can be used for essential tasks across Jira teams and projects, such as project planning, reporting, sprint planning, and release management. | $10 per month per user |
| Planview Portfolios | Structure by Tempo | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Planview Portfolios | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
94% Would buy again 66 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
94% Delivers good value for the price 47 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 66 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 30 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
74% Implementation went as expected 34 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Planview Portfolios | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Microsoft Project Server Score5.1 out of 10 | Microsoft Project Server Score5.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Planview PPM Pro Score8.9 out of 10 | Planview PPM Pro Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Planview Portfolios | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.3 | - |
| Usability | 7.2 | - |
| Availability | 9.0 | - |
| Performance | 7.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.2 | - |
| In-Person Training | 6.4 | - |
| Online Training | 6.8 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Configurability | 8.6 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 6.4 | - |
| Ease of integration | 4.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 | - |
| Professional Services | 8.4 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 5.5 | - |
| Planview Portfolios | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Online Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Professional Services |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Planview Portfolios Screenshots |








