PractiTest vs. SpiraTeam

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PractiTest
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.
$39
user
SpiraTeam
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Inflectra SpiraTeam is a project Management solution built around capabilities such as bug tracking, quality assurance, and collaboration.N/A
Pricing
PractiTestSpiraTeam
Editions & Modules
Professional
$39.00
user
Enterprise
$49.00
user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PractiTestSpiraTeam
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
PractiTestSpiraTeam
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
PractiTest
8.5
4 Ratings
6% above category average
SpiraTeam
-
Ratings
Centralized test management9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Defect management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PractiTestSpiraTeam
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.5 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.5 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PractiTestSpiraTeam
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(4 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
PractiTestSpiraTeam
Likelihood to Recommend
PractiTest
PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
*Well Suited for Organizations having [fewer] numbers of Tech People that [means] it's easy to operate and maintain. Currently find no scenarios for its less [appropriateness]
Read full review
Pros
PractiTest
  • Effective Test case template.
  • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
  • Report generation.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • Very easy to use.
  • Entire collaboration suite for the software development lifecycle.
  • Configurable to particular project needs.
Read full review
Cons
PractiTest
  • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • Some more sample reports or allow for a cross reference reporting engine
Read full review
Usability
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
The usability is excellent in most cases but lacks some intuitive functions, such as a copy to the clipboard for selected items. In fact, in an older version, a COPY button copied all selected records rather than putting it on the clipboard. The button has been renamed recently to CLONE, otherwise, my rating would be lower.
Read full review
Support Rating
PractiTest
The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
PractiTest
I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
None Other Used
Read full review
Return on Investment
PractiTest
  • Test Reporting
  • Defect Management
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • Better historical information about what happend in past releases, deeper integration with the whole software development life cycle.
Read full review
ScreenShots

PractiTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of