PractiTest vs. TestRail

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PractiTest
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.
$39
user
TestRail
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.
$35
per month billed annually
Pricing
PractiTestTestRail
Editions & Modules
Professional
$39.00
user
Enterprise
$49.00
user
Professional Cloud
$35
per month billed annually per user
Professional Cloud
$38
per month per user
Enterprise Cloud
$71
per month billed annually per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PractiTestTestRail
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PractiTestTestRail
Considered Both Products
PractiTest

No answer on this topic

TestRail
Chose TestRail
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
PractiTestTestRail
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
PractiTest
8.5
4 Ratings
5% above category average
TestRail
7.3
3 Ratings
10% below category average
Centralized test management9.24 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Map tests to user stories8.44 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Test execution reporting8.44 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Defect management8.03 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PractiTestTestRail
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.7 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.2 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.2 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PractiTestTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(4 ratings)
6.5
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PractiTestTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
PractiTest
PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
The integration with other tools, and their user friendly layout and design. It's very comfortable to use and is way better than other tools with the Automation Testing tools, thanks to the great API that is included. Sometimes the integration with Jira is a little faulty, but the links to that tool usually work well. It could be cool if it had a better following for the bug items that were registered on other tools.
Read full review
Pros
PractiTest
  • Effective Test case template.
  • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
  • Report generation.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • Managing test plans and test cases
  • Generation of test results
  • Modularised way of storing tests
Read full review
Cons
PractiTest
  • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • Outstanding user bugs
  • UI is clunky
  • Things are not where you think they would be
Read full review
Usability
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
As I am a tester, for me I found this tool to be new in terms of everything like the management of tests, plans, releases, reporting,etc. It is overall a good tool for test reporting and can be used for reference in the future. I liked several features of on the go placement of screenshots. Also I feel like the UI , the font, the color combination can be improved
Read full review
Support Rating
PractiTest
The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
PractiTest
I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd.
Read full review
Return on Investment
PractiTest
  • Test Reporting
  • Defect Management
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • We are able to easily pull reports any time management would like to see them
  • Jira integration makes it easy to attach to stories/defects and save time
  • A quick overview at the system's health as a whole is easy to see from TestRail
Read full review
ScreenShots

PractiTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of