Progress Test Studio vs. Tricentis Testim
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Progress Test Studio | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Progress Test Studio aims to be the easiest to use Web Automation tool on the market, widely used by Enterprise QA’s for testing, but easy enough for anyone. The product automates testing for WPF, Silverlight, Web, HTML, Angular, React, KUIB, iOS, Android, Mobile Web, and API’s. Test Studio is ideal for a no-code or low-code approach for: QA Test Automation, Application Monitoring, Performance and Load Testing, Web/Marketing Process Automation, and Mobile App Automation. | N/A |
Tricentis Testim | Score7.6 out of 10 | N/A | Testim.io, from Tricentis since the February 2022 acquisition, leverages machine learning for the authoring, execution and maintenance of automated test cases. Testim uses dynamic locators and learns with every execution. It is designed to produce fast authoring and stable tests that learn, thus eliminating the need to continually maintain tests with every code change. | $30,000 per year |
| Progress Test Studio | Tricentis Testim | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Progress Test Studio | Tricentis Testim | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Would buy again 13 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 13 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 78% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 85% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | |
| Progress Test Studio | Tricentis Testim | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | TestComplete Score8 out of 10 | TestComplete Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | OpenText UFT One Score8 out of 10 | OpenText UFT One Score8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SoapUI Open Source Score8.3 out of 10 | SoapUI Open Source Score8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Progress Test Studio | Tricentis Testim | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.1 |
| Usability | - | 8.2 |
| Support Rating | - | 6.6 |
| Progress Test Studio | Tricentis Testim | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Progress Test Studio Screenshots | Tricentis Testim Screenshots |










