Risk Proof vs. SEON. Fraud Fighters

Risk proof is well suited for quickly finding out potential money laundering [clients] and how much risk would it pose to get into a deal with the client. Risk proof is less suited around some ethical practice assessment of an organization. Such a scenario needs more manual intervention rather than tool assessment.

Incentivized

It is well suited for smaller businesses that would be a lot more in danger if a bigger amount of fraudulent transactions would come in. SEON is removing threats, bad merchants, and fraudsters from the equation.

• Data based visualization
• Open source for data gathering
• Thorough risk assessment

Incentivized

• Transaction Verification
• order tracking

Incentivized

• More market reach
• More tools for decision making by boardroom
• Lesser price for more client base

Incentivized

• We did not really experience any cons of using SEON Sense so far

Their support is great, but it would be a lot better if they would have agents always ready to help.

It was the tool used in the organization for risk assessment of any potential leads and deals. Before the tool, we used to analyze any risks using manual effort and approach which used to take a lot more man-hours and less reliable quantitative analysis for similar kinds of deals and scenarios.

Incentivized

I have not used another similar product.

Incentivized

• Helped determining risks for ongoing deals
• Helped in Decision making process in board meetings
• Negative: Added some cost to the project

Incentivized

• Helped keep structure reputation.
• Expedite filtering operations.
• Prevented chargeback costs.

Incentivized