TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    QAD Adaptive ERP

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/AQAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A

    TensorFlow

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/ATensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.N/A
    Pricing
    QAD Adaptive ERPTensorFlow
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    QAD Adaptive ERPTensorFlow
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    QAD Adaptive ERPTensorFlow
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    28% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Pay calculation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    28% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration9.92 Ratings00 Ratings
    Plug-ins10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    10.0
    5 Ratings
    17% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    9% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    8.8
    3 Ratings
    13% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Accounts payable7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts receivable7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    9.5
    5 Ratings
    17% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory tracking10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic reordering8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    7.9
    5 Ratings
    1% below category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Pricing4.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order entry8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Credit card processing9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Orchestration8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    6% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Billing Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Period Close8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Procurement
    Comparison of Procurement features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    23% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Logistics
    Comparison of Logistics features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    25% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Trade and Customs Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fulfillment Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    8.8
    2 Ratings
    16% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Production Process Design8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Production Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Work Execution9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    8.8
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Forecasting8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Planning10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of QAD Adaptive ERP and TensorFlow
    Feature
    QAD Adaptive ERP
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    TensorFlow
    -
    Ratings
    Product Master Data Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    QAD Adaptive ERPTensorFlow
    Small Businesses
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    QAD Adaptive ERPTensorFlow
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    6.0
    (15 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    QAD Adaptive ERPTensorFlow
    Likelihood to Recommend
    QAD
    If you're setting up operations where you have to manage manufacturing builds from raw components to finished goods, I would recommend QAD. It's nice to have subassemblies part numbers for your builds and enter in the number of accepted quantities and rejects. QAD is very helpful if you have a lot of parts floating around. I would not buy QAD if you only have to manage less than ~20 parts... just use Excel.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    TensorFlow is great for most deep learning purposes. This is especially true in two domains: 1. Computer vision: image classification, object detection and image generation via generative adversarial networks 2. Natural language processing: text classification and generation. The good community support often means that a lot of off-the-shelf models can be used to prove a concept or test an idea quickly. That, and Google's promotion of Colab means that ideas can be shared quite freely. Training, visualizing and debugging models is very easy in TensorFlow, compared to other platforms (especially the good old Caffe days). In terms of productionizing, it's a bit of a mixed bag. In our case, most of our feature building is performed via Apache Spark. This means having to convert Parquet (columnar optimized) files to a TensorFlow friendly format i.e., protobufs. The lack of good JVM bindings mean that our projects end up being a mix of Python and Scala. This makes it hard to reuse some of the tooling and support we wrote in Scala. This is where MXNet shines better (though its Scala API could do with more work).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    QAD
    • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
    • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
    • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • A vast library of functions for all kinds of tasks - Text, Images, Tabular, Video etc.
    • Amazing community helps developers obtain knowledge faster and get unblocked in this active development space.
    • Integration of high-level libraries like Keras and Estimators make it really simple for a beginner to get started with neural network based models.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    QAD
    • The layout is old fashion. Can be more modern.
    • QAD Adaptive ERP has alot of functions that can be overwhelming to new users
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • RNNs are still a bit lacking, compared to Theano.
    • Cannot handle sequence inputs
    • Theano is perhaps a bit faster and eats up less memory than TensorFlow on a given GPU, perhaps due to element-wise ops. Tensorflow wins for multi-GPU and “compilation” time.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    QAD
    The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    QAD
    Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Support of multiple components and ease of development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    QAD
    I haven't contacted support for QAD yet.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    QAD
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Use of cloud for better execution power is recommended.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    QAD
    QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features, Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, for sure TensorFlow is the right choice
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    QAD
    • It help us to reduce the inventories (FG and RAW)
    • It reduce the time to adjust to the constantly changing international customs laws
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Learning is s bit difficult takes lot of time.
    • Developing or implementing the whole neural network is time consuming with this, as you have to write everything.
    • Once you have learned this, it make your job very easy of getting the good result.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots