Qlik Replicate vs. SQL Server Integration Services

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Qlik Replicate
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Replicate enables organizations to accelerate data real-time replication, ingestion and streaming via change data capture, across a wide range of heterogeneous databases, data warehouses and data lake platforms.N/A
SSIS
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) is a data integration solution.N/A
Pricing
Qlik ReplicateSQL Server Integration Services
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Qlik ReplicateSSIS
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Qlik ReplicateSQL Server Integration Services
Considered Both Products
Qlik Replicate
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate's power is in its simple 1:1 copying of database tables and architecture and maintaining a near real-time copy of that database. Talend and SSIS are different tools and more for custom ETL's that require various steps to connect to SFTP or download files. …
Chose Qlik Replicate
SSIS lacks real time replication and the only place where it can beat SSIS.
Additionally, has more end point connectors than SSIS,
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate / Attunity was able to be put on our server behind our firewall where with Fivetran would have required. Fivetran would also have required a different SQL server CDC setup. HVR was just as powerful if not more but was more costly and the user interface was not …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Simple to do one-to-one copy and very reliable, as other tools a little complex in setting up the pipelines and scheduling parts. Very simple to connect to the SFTP locations and easy to download them as well.
Chose Qlik Replicate
We selected Qlik Replicate because it was the easiest to use with the least network overhead. The team was able to master the application in under an hour--significantly less than IBM or Informatica.
SSIS
Chose SQL Server Integration Services
SQL Server Integration Services is a good alternative to cut down on costs and have more flexibility on developing.
Features
Qlik ReplicateSQL Server Integration Services
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services
6.0
54 Ratings
31% below category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings8.054 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings4.041 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services
7.0
54 Ratings
14% below category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings10.054 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings4.053 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services
7.0
52 Ratings
11% below category average
Data model creation00 Ratings8.627 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings7.133 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings5.043 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings8.039 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings6.049 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services
3.0
42 Ratings
90% below category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings3.037 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings3.037 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Qlik ReplicateSQL Server Integration Services
Small Businesses
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.2 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 8.4 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 8.4 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Qlik ReplicateSQL Server Integration Services
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(35 ratings)
8.0
(54 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.2
(3 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(32 ratings)
8.0
(9 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
7.2
(3 ratings)
8.0
(8 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.2
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Qlik ReplicateSQL Server Integration Services
Likelihood to Recommend
Qlik
Qlik Replicate works very well with relational data platforms, both on premise and in the cloud, for example Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL and others, it also works very well with DB2. If the data source is MongoDB, it is more complicated and currently there is no possibility of sending data to MongoDB.
Read full review
Microsoft
Ideal if the company is already a Microsoft shop, so chances are that it is free with SQL Server. Also, good for moving data between on premise systems. Not ideal for moving data to the cloud. No functionality out of the box to work with REST APIs. Stable product but definitely not the future
Read full review
Pros
Qlik
  • Replicate is extremely stable and does not generate a lot of alerts/failures/issues that take up time to troubleshoot.
  • It is very easy to add new source tables to a Replicate task so that we're always in sync with new data available from the CRM.
  • It's nice that Qlik Replicate also allows you to create a job to stop and then restart your tasks during maintenance windows that occur on both the source and target systems.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Standard ETL use cases for daily loads
  • Loading incoming data from Vendors which is placed on FTP and adding them to the SQL Warehouse
  • Creating outgoing data files and writing them to Vendor FTPs
  • Easy Active Directory integration for seamless connections to SQL Server
  • CI/CD by hosting the code on visualstudio.com
Read full review
Cons
Qlik
  • The base Replicate web GUI is lacking. If you have dozens or more tasks, it's hard to get a sense of how they're performing. Enterprise Manager solves all of these problems but is a separate install.
  • The support portal is extremely difficult to navigate. It's hard to track down exactly what you're looking for.
  • It would be helpful to have better documentation and example queries for the tables in the Enterprise Manager analytics database.
  • Destination databases that don't support common DDL commands behave unpredictably. And the replication of schema changes isn't consistent.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Connection managers for online data sources can be tricky to configure.
  • Performance tuning is an art form and trialing different data flow task options can be cumbersome. SSIS can do a better job of providing performance data including historical for monitoring.
  • Mapping destination using OLE DB command is difficult as destination columns are unnamed.
  • Excel or flat file connections are limited by version and type.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Qlik
The availability of the replicated data in disparate environments has is now crucial. Replacing a product like Qlik Replicate would require significant time, investments, and work. In addition, Qlik Replicate is reasonably reliable with few failures.
Read full review
Microsoft
Some features should be revised or improved, some tools (using it with Visual Studio) of the toolbox should be less schematic and somewhat more flexible. Using for example, the CSV data import is still very old-fashioned and if the data format changes it requires a bit of manual labor to accept the new data structure
Read full review
Usability
Qlik
We now have greater business flexibility and scalability, and our big data integration projects have a quick rate of growth, which has been profitable for us. Independent of the sources involved, maintaining data consistency between sources is easy. One of my favorite features is the way it lets owners of the source system start and stop processes from updating their system windows.
Read full review
Microsoft
SSIS is a great tool for most ETL needs. It has the 90% (or more) use cases covered and even in many of the use cases where it is not ideal SSIS can be extended via a .NET language to do the job well in a supportable way for almost any performance workload.
Read full review
Performance
Qlik
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SQL Server Integration Services performance is dependent directly upon the resources provided to the system. In our environment, we allocated 6 nodes of 4 CPUs, 64GB each, running in parallel. Unfortunately, we had to ramp-up to such a robust environment to get the performance to where we needed it. Most of the reports are completed in a reasonable timeframe. However, in the case of slow running reports, it is often difficult if not impossible to cancel the report without killing the report instance or stopping the service.
Read full review
Support Rating
Qlik
The issue I've had is that Qlik does an awful job of keeping their customers informed when new versions of the software are available. We found that we were using a version that was no longer supported and could never get help. When it came time to get us upgraded so that we were on a current version, no one knew how to help get us to where we needed to be. We had to purchased professional services time and even then I was basically on my own to get everything built out and set up. Qlik needs to be more proactive with communicating about new releases and how to get your version upgraded in the most secure, safe way possible.
Read full review
Microsoft
The support, when necessary, is excellent. But beyond that, it is very rarely necessary because the user community is so large, vibrant and knowledgable, a simple Google query or forum question can answer almost everything you want to know. You can also get prewritten script tasks with a variety of functionality that saves a lot of time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Qlik
Follow the directions from the Qlik documentation. They are pretty straight forward and easy enough to follow. If you follow these, then you are not likely to have issues on implementation.
Read full review
Microsoft
The implementation may be different in each case, it is important to properly analyze all the existing infrastructure to understand the kind of work needed, the type of software used and the compatibility between these, the features that you want to exploit, to understand what is possible and which ones require integration with third-party tools
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Qlik
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask compared to other solutions.
Read full review
Microsoft
I had nothing to do with the choice or install. I assume it was made because it's easy to integrate with our SQL Server environment and free. I'm not sure of any other enterprise level solution that would solve this problem, but I would likely have approached it with traditional scripting. Comparably free, but my own familiarity with trad scripts would be my final deciding factor. Perhaps with some further training on SSIS I would have a different answer.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Qlik
  • Prior to using Qlik Replicate, we used an ETL solution to copy data from the Oracle ERP system to the Microsoft SQL Server BI system at a 15-minute interval. It was very tedious to maintain. Qlik Replicate is much easier to use and we replicate data near real-time now.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Data integrity across various products allows unify certain processes inside the organization and save funds by reducing human labour factor.
  • Automated data unification allows us plan our inputs better and reduce over-warehousing by overbuying
  • The employee number, responsible for data management was reduced from 4 to 1 person
Read full review
ScreenShots

Qlik Replicate Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of