TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

QuestDB vs. Titan Distributed Graph Database

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    QuestDB

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AQuestDB is an open source time series database. It implements SQL and exposes a Postgres wire protocol, a REST API, and supports ingestion with InfluxDB line protocol.N/A

    Titan

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATitan is an open-source distributed graph database developed by Aurelius. Aurelius is now part of Datastax (since February 2015).N/A
    Pricing
    QuestDBTitan
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    QuestDBTitan
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    QuestDBTitan
    Small Businesses
    InfluxDB
    Score9 out of 10
    Neo4j
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Neo4j
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Neo4j
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    QuestDBTitan
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    QuestDBTitan
    Likelihood to Recommend
    QuestDB
    QuestDB is well suited for any use case where you need to store large amount of data and the performance is the key factor - for both reads and writes. So use cases like market data storage in financial industry, any kind of telemetry, etc.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Titan is definitely a good choice, but it has its learning curve. The documentation may lack in places, and you might have to muster answers from different sources and technologies. But at its core, it does the job of storing and querying graph databases really well. Remember that titan itself is not the whole component, but utilizes other technologies like cassandra, gremlin, tinkerpop, etc to do many other things, and each of them has a learning curve. I would recommend titan for a team, but not for a single person. For single developer, go with Neo4j.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    QuestDB
    • Extreme performance.
    • Super easy to use.
    • Compatibility with Influx line protocol.
    • PostgreSQL compatibility.
    • Out of order timestamps.
    • Support for multiple records with same timestamp.
    • Integration with Grafana.
    • Team responsiveness.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Titan is really good for abstraction of underlying infrastructure. You can choose between different storage engine of your choice.
    • Open source, backed by community, and free.
    • Supports tinkerpop stack which is backed by apache.
    • Uses gremlin for query language making the whole query structure standardized and open for extension if another graph database comes along in future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    QuestDB
    • New project so needs a bit polishing.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • The community is lacking deep documentation. I had to spend many nights trying to figure many things on my own. As graph databases will grow popular, I am sure this will be improved.
    • Not enough community support. Even in SO you might not find many questions. Though there are some users in SO who quickly answer graph database questions. Need more support.
    • Would love an official docker image.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    QuestDB
    We were looking for time series database that will be able to handle L2 market data and came across QuestDB. From the beginning we were impressed how well the QuestDB performs and that it actually significantly outperforms all other open source TSDB on market like InfluxDB, ClickHouse, Timescale, etc. Apart from the excellent performance it is also super easy to use and deploy which makes the experience of using the database very pleasant - we were able to be up and running and storing data within few hours. Topic itself is the QuestDB team that is super responsive on their slack channel and always ready to help with any query. They are constantly improving the product and if there is some missing feature that is blocking you from usage they always try the best to implement such feature asap and release a new version - one of the best support I have ever seen so far in open source community.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    To be honest, titan is not as popular as Neo4j, though they do the same thing. In my personal opinion, titan has lot of potential, but Neo4j is easier to use. If the organization is big enough, it might choose titan because of its open source nature, and high scalability, but Neo4j comes with a lot of enterprise and community support, better query, better documentation, better instructions, and is also backed by leading tech companies. But titan is very strong when you consider standards. Titan follows gremlin and tinkerpop, both of which will be huge in future as more graph database vendors join the market. If things go really well, maybe Neo4j might have to support gremlin as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    QuestDB
    • Reduced cost.
    • Increased efficiency.
    • Faster time to market.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Steep learning curve. Your engineers would have to spend lots of time learning different components before they feel comfortable.
    • Have to plan ahead. Maybe this is the nature of graph databases, but I found it difficult to change my schemas after I had data in production.
    • It is free, so time is the only resource you have to put in titan.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    QuestDB Screenshots

    Screenshot of Fast SQL for time seriesScreenshot of Console to query and visualize dataF