Ranorex vs. Tricentis qTest
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranorex | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Over 14,000+ users worldwide automate tests with Ranorex Studio, which promises to enable rapid delivery of high-quality desktop, mobile, and web applications. The vendor says that with over 10 years in test automation, Ranorex Studio supports automating functional UI tests for even the most challenging technologies, from legacy applications to the latest web and mobile platforms. Ranorex Studio is an all-in-one tool that empowers everyone on the team. Key benefits and… | $890 per additional endpoint |
Tricentis qTest | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018. | $1,200 per year per user |
| Ranorex | Tricentis qTest | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | All licenses are perpetual and include 12 months of maintenance and email support. A runtime floating license requires at least one premium license for test creation. Please contact our sales team for information about possible volume discounts and options for enterprise support. Consulting, integration and training services are available from our partners worldwide. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Ranorex | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 78% Would buy again 31 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 84% Delivers good value for the price 26 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 37 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 78% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Implementation went as expected 27 Answers | |
| Ranorex | Tricentis qTest | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Ranorex | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 1.0 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.7 |
| Support Rating | 6.0 | 1.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.0 |
| Ranorex | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Ranorex Screenshots | Tricentis qTest Screenshots |









