Rapise vs. Testsigma

The appropriate scenario to use Rapise is when we have a project that is considered from medium onwards, since Rapise will help us to define, develop and implement the testing phase in a reliable and efficient way. Also with Rapise we will not have to worry about the platform that we are using since it has great versatility and flexibility.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

It's well suited for straightforward test cases that can run in batch in a short period of time. It's less appropriate for more complex cases that require visual or ID changes, simply because if you run a test case, it won't always see the same IDs and objects that you recorded. It's great for running batch cases on general functionality.

• Simple recording front-end and easily captures UI objects for later interaction
• Flexible programming interface provides a multitude of manners in which to interact with learned UI objects
• Javascript based IDE is easy to learn

• Helps record and redo test cases without needing your own machine to run or record them.
• Is consistent with how it approaches test cases.
• Provides full recordings of test cases and error reports.

• For tests that require specific approaches it is necessary to have advanced knowledge of programming in javascrip, which sometimes the QA team does not have experience
• Sometimes I have noticed that when using object dragging errors occur intermittently
• The integration with some tools (Dynamics) is only with the basic functions from my point of view

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• AI Implementation sometimes throws test cases off the mark.
• Object and ID detection are not consistent (Recorder will detect, the test run will not).

It's not perfected yet; the app's detection and replication aren't 100% reliable, but they're reliable enough to run hundreds of cases a week. The cost-to-benefit ratio feels off and would deter companies from staying. Their staff is very communicative and eager to improve, which brings it back up.

Mmuch better from a flexibility perspective

The major benefit over the others so far is the ability to run test cases with other devices and have them run in the background as a separate machine. However, the app's cost works against this feature.

• The primary objective of the institution is a service to the public, so everything that improves response times to the public helps us to achieve it.
• As a department in charge of the development of systems and applications, our objective is fulfilled by delivering quality products and tools such as Rapise help us greatly
• The return on investment can be more than justified by fulfilling the primary objectives

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Has saved hundreds of manual hours of test case runs.
• Has helped identify various issues previously unknown.