Razorops vs. Spinnaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Razorops
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$49
per month per user
Spinnaker
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Spinnaker is an open source continuous delivery platform with a range of cluster management and deployment management features, originally developed at Netflix.N/A
Pricing
RazoropsSpinnaker
Editions & Modules
Basic
$49
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
RazoropsSpinnaker
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
RazoropsSpinnaker
Best Alternatives
RazoropsSpinnaker
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
RazoropsSpinnaker
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
RazoropsSpinnaker
Likelihood to Recommend
Razorops
No answers on this topic
Netflix
Spinnaker suits well for applications which are stateless and can adapt to an immutable architecture of deployment. But for applications which are stateful and cannot afford to spin up new servers for every deployment doesn't go well with Spinnaker. It can handle only deployments which are VM based and cannot support deployments to serverless architecture like AWS Lambda etc.
Read full review
Pros
Razorops
No answers on this topic
Netflix
  • Fast deployments.
  • Can be integrated with a good variety of other products.
  • Also provides some insights from your environment.
Read full review
Cons
Razorops
No answers on this topic
Netflix
  • It does NOT support CFN based deployments
  • Windows based systems finds it difficult to onboard to Spinnaker.
  • Pipeline level access authorisation is not there.
  • Support for EBS volume encryption is probably missing.
  • Attach/detach EBS volumes during deployments is difficult.
  • No support to deploy the artifacts without re-creating the servers. Only pure immutable deployment are allowed.
  • Open-source - so good and bad!
  • Spinnaker on its own has 10 underlying micro services. Managing Spinnaker needs a focussed platform approach.
  • User authentication is easy but authorisation management is not straight forward.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Razorops
No answers on this topic
Netflix
• Pipeline Expressiveness • Self-Service/Override • Visibility of Client Teams • Operability of Client Teams - • High-Quality Integrations (AWS, IHP, Google) • Extensibility – (Ability to add code) • The maturity of Deployment Process • Speed/Ease of Onboarding
Read full review
Return on Investment
Razorops
No answers on this topic
Netflix
  • By using Spinnaker we are able to deploy new versions of our product quickly.
  • A deployment takes in average 2 minutes.
  • Our investment on Spinnaker was just time learning it.
Read full review
ScreenShots