Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes vs. Waves

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.N/A
Waves
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Waves is an all-encompassing gateway blockchain protocol, from Waves Technologies in headquartered in Berlin. Leveraging the Waves protocol, the solution is designed to offer a developer-friendly infrastructure as an experimental ground for innovation.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for KubernetesWaves
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for KubernetesWaves
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for KubernetesWaves
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
8.4
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Waves
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for KubernetesWaves
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for KubernetesWaves
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for KubernetesWaves
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.
Read full review
Waves Technologies
There really is no scenario that Waves could not be used well suited for a studio environment. For instance, when I have someone come over to record, I use waves tune realtime in post production. And it really helps just get the flat/sharp notes on key easily. And the Abbey Road collection!! WOW!!! It sounds so good! Also, I use the API and SSL on my master chain to give it that "polished" feel in the end
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
  • Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
  • Built-in Security & compliance.
Read full review
Waves Technologies
  • Offers massive library of tools
  • Easy installation and updates
  • Fantastic support and instructions online
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
  • Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
  • LCM of ACM itself.
Read full review
Waves Technologies
  • Can be a bit CPU intensive at times
  • I wish the EQ options were a little better
  • I wish the Waves Tune Real-Time were little more accurate
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.
Read full review
Waves Technologies
Waves seems to be the industry standard for mixing plugins. It integrates well with most DAWs and even has the option for Waves sound grid for live mixing. Using a DAW like Cubase, Protools, etc could introduce latency, while Sound Grid provides a near latency-free experience. Other solutions could prove to be difficult to implement.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
  • Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
  • Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.
Read full review
Waves Technologies
  • It gave me the ability to tune vocals without them sounding "autotuned," therefore, making the singer feel like they sang it that much better. Just a confidence booster.
  • It gives me the opportunity for simply mastering a song. If a customer only wants a song mastered, I can effectively do that.
  • It is a bit costly when you first purchase, but it makes up for itself when you need it. I feel like it was money well spent.
Read full review
ScreenShots