Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Splunk Cloud Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.
$5,000
per year
Splunk Cloud Platform
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Splunk Cloud Platform is a data platform service thats help users search, analyze, visualize and act on data. The service can go live in as little as two days, and with an IT backend managed by Splunk experts.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSplunk Cloud Platform
Editions & Modules
Basic Tower
5,000
per year
Enterprise Tower
10,000
per year
Premium Tower
14,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnsibleSplunk Cloud Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSplunk Cloud Platform
Considered Both Products
Ansible

No answer on this topic

Splunk Cloud Platform
Chose Splunk Cloud Platform
I believe there is no existing competitor of Splunk and the way Splunk Cloud provides support is way better than all the other competitors. No one can beat Splunk Cloud!!
Features
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSplunk Cloud Platform
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
8.1
150 Ratings
1% above category average
Splunk Cloud Platform
-
Ratings
Infrastructure Automation8.9144 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Provisioning8.3141 Ratings00 Ratings
Parallel Execution8.5134 Ratings00 Ratings
Node Management8.5126 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Logging7.4138 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control7.3122 Ratings00 Ratings
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Splunk Cloud Platform
8.2
20 Ratings
4% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.019 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings8.419 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings9.220 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings7.320 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings7.818 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings8.217 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings7.510 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings7.28 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.210 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings7.58 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings8.810 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings8.811 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSplunk Cloud Platform
Small Businesses
HashiCorp Vagrant
HashiCorp Vagrant
Score 10.0 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Automox
Automox
Score 8.9 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Automox
Automox
Score 8.9 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSplunk Cloud Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(171 ratings)
9.2
(18 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(5 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(57 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(5 ratings)
7.2
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.6
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSplunk Cloud Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
Red Hat Ansible automates server management, configuration updates, and deployments across our server infrastructure, keeping everything consistent, reducing human error, and saving time. Also provides detailed reports on what is done and uses role-based access controls to keep systems secure by controlling who can make changes.
Read full review
Cisco
Splunk is excellent when all your data is in one location. Its ability to correlate all that data is intuitive (once the hurdle of learning the query language is overcome). It is also easy to standardize the presentation of information to the company. When data is siloed/standalone, other systems can be cheaper and faster to implement.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • It reduces custom scripting efforts because everything can be scripted in simple, human-readable YAML playbooks.
  • Not only servers, but also network devices, VMs, Containers, Kubernetes clusters, etc., can be automated via Ansible, showcasing its extensive list of supported devices.
  • It is agentless, which makes it lightweight and allows for easy integration into CI/CD and GitOps pipelines.
  • Many Tier-1 telcos use Ansible for Day 0/1/2 automation of RAN, transport, and core infrastructure (e.g., network function lifecycle management, NE configuration push, patching VNFs).
Read full review
Cisco
  • This SIEM consolidates multiple data points and offers several features and benefits, creating custom dashboards and managing alert workflows.
  • Splunk Cloud provides a simple way to have a central monitoring and security solution. Though it does not have a huge learning curve, you should spend some time learning the basics.
  • Splunk Cloud enables me to create and schedule statistical reports on network use for Management.
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • I can't think of any right now because I've heard about the Lightspeed and I'm really excited about that. Ansible has been really solid for us. We haven't had any issues. Maybe the upgrade process, but other than that, as coming from a user, it's awesome.
  • Give out Lightspeed for free.
Read full review
Cisco
  • The SPL programming language that the queries are built in is not very intuitive.
  • There should be a better repository of pre-built queries for what I would think of as common Active Directory usage monitoring.
  • I would like to see more free training/familiarization information made available.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
Even is if it's a great tool, we are looking to renew our licence for our production servers only. The product is very expensive to use, so we might look for a cheaper solution for our non-production servers. One of the solution we are looking, is AWX, free, and similar to AAP. This is be perfect for our non-production servers.
Read full review
Cisco
Ease of use and have all the features we need
Read full review
Usability
Red Hat
Overall, the product is excellent, with daily-use features for both large and small infrastructure. Ansible does its job quickly and ensures compliance, keeping the environment up to date and safe from open vulnerabilities. Large-scale inventory management and license management. Industry standard followed by best practices to maintain continuity. Budget-friendly compared to other products.
Read full review
Cisco
What it does well:
- Powerful SPL query language for advanced users
- Excellent visualization dashboards
- Comprehensive documentation and community support
Where it needs work:
- Steep learning curve for SPL syntax
- Non-Intuitive UI for beginners
- Complex administration and data model configuration
- Search performance degrades with poor query optimization
Bottom line: Enterprise-grade tool requiring dedicated training investment. Best for teams with experienced analysts.
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Red Hat
There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
Read full review
Cisco
Splunk Cloud support is sorely lacking unfortunately. The portal where you submit tickets is not very good and is lacking polish. Tickets are left for days without any updates and when chased it is only sometimes you get a reply back. I get the feeling the support team are very understaffed and have far too much going on. From what I know, Splunk is aware of this and seem to be trying to remedy it.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Red Hat
I spoke on this topic today!
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
AAP compares favorably with Terraform and Power Automate. I don't have much experience with Terraform, but I find AAP and Ansible easier to use as well as having more capabilities. Power Platform is also an excellent automation tool that is user friendly but I feel that Ansible has more compatibility with a variety of technologies.
Read full review
Cisco
Search Processing Language really is a game changer for writing easy-to-understand and maintainable queries on your data base logs. Once understood, setting up and validating a query can be done in no time- which leaves us the option to focus on more monitoring and improved services. We have no other tools that utilizes data this efficiently
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • POSITIVE: currently used by the IT department and some others, but we want others to use it.
  • NEGATIVE: We need less technical output for the non-technical. It should be controllable or a setting within playbooks. We also need more graphical responses (non-technical).
  • POSITIVE: Always being updated and expanded (CaC, EDA, Policy as Code, execution environments, AI, etc..)
Read full review
Cisco
  • End-end visibility across your departmental silos
  • Strengthen the overall global monitoring posture
  • Move from Reactive to Proactive Monitoring
  • Highly secure environment at your finger-tips
  • Takes you away from managing infrastructure/administration, allows saving time & money. Reduce the overall TCO (Total Cost of Ownership)
Read full review
ScreenShots