TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization vs. SUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenShift Virtualization is a feature of Red Hat OpenShift that offers a unified, scalable platform for migrating traditional VMs. It ensures consistent management across hybrid cloud environments and supports modernization efforts.N/A

    SUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester)

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ASUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester) is an open-source hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) platform built on Kubernetes. It runs on bare metal servers and combines KVM-based virtual machine management, distributed block storage, and networking in a single cluster. It manages virtual machines (VMs) and containers together, and SUSE positions it as an open-source alternative for operators moving off traditional virtualization stacks.N/A
    Pricing
    Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester)
    Considered Both Products
    Red Hat
    No answer on this topic
    SUSE
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    45 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    40 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    43 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    33 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    36 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester)
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind HCA
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
    Score10 out of 10
    StarWind HCA
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (46 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.2
    (29 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.9
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSUSE Virtualization (formerly Harvester)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Red Hat
    I believe that Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is a very promising option for hypervisor at the moment and it seems to be improving quickly. Red Hat is doing a great job working with customers on feature set requests and improving UX and stability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    It's great for provisioning any kind of virtual servers, but for now, we use it to provision only servers for Rancher managed Kubernetes clusters. But we are considering to provision also virtual servers for all kinds of needs on SUSE Harvester in the near future, as it's getting more and more mature with every release.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Red Hat
    • It's a one pane of glass, so when we have Rev only it was a hypervisor for VMs. OpenShift, you can put Ansible in it, you can hook into satellite, it can do with OpenShift AI. You can do AI models and stuff like that. So I think it's more like a Swiss Army knife rather than a fire extinguisher.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    • Fast to deploy new virtual machines
    • It's easy to use
    • Stable and ready for production
    • Free and open source
    • Has a strong community
    Read full review
    Cons
    Red Hat
    • Because of how different virtualization is done, there is a learning curve to overcome when switching to it from another hypervisor.
    • Documentation needs to be improved. Just finding the details to set it up is a burden that will keep some people using it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    • It takes expertise to set up SUSE Harvester for production
    • You need to get used to SUSE Harvester to be as "fluent" as in VMWare ESXi
    • You need to well prepare for system upgrades
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Red Hat
    OpenShift is really easy of use through its management console. OpenShift gives a very large flexibility through many inbuilt functionalities, all gathered in the same place (it's a very convenient tool to learn DevOps technics hands on) OpenShift is an ideal integrated development / deployment platform for containers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Red Hat
    The product is maturing at an amazing rate, but there is still work to do to reach existing VMware customers. Most notably are the HA/DR features, and backup/recovery. We need to have faster backup capabilities, and I know this is in the works with change block tracking - but it is a challenge today. Some users are also scared by the number of volumes created by Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, as opposed to the number of VMFS volumes they are used to.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Red Hat
    I've not noticed any significant performance impacts with Red Hat OpenShift. I think the development team has put a lot of effort into ensuring that it is performant. And so performance typically is not a major concern for us with Red Hat OpenShift.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Red Hat
    Speedy support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Red Hat
    The learning curve is quite high but worth it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Red Hat
    Red Hat OpenShift is a more complete and integrated platform, with lots of out of the box components that the other platforms don't have, and customers need to stack lots of other software in order to have monitoring, cost management, log management, user policies governance, and more. Another great benefit Red Hat OpenShift delivers ir the supported operators.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    We used ESXi for years and were happy with it. Then we implemented Rancher managed Kubernetes clusters with nodes provisioned on VMware ESXi. Later, when SUSE Harvester came out, we started to provision SUSE Rancher nodes on Harvester. Both VMware ESXi and SUSE Harvester are great products, and I think - we are keeping both, at least for now, when SUSE Harvester is a young project.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Red Hat
    • The TCO of OpenShift is lower than with VMware
    • Implementing VMware has allowed us to drop third party solutions that were effectively required to have a proper vmware deployment
    • Licensing over has become less complicated as we also no longer need separate RHEL licesnes
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SUSE
    • We can provision more virtual servers
    • It's cheaper than competitor products (tbh - it's free, if you don't need support)
    • It's easy to manage when you get used to it
    Read full review
    ScreenShots