Likelihood to Recommend We use SQL Compare to troubleshoot performance problems quite a bit since our data model is more like a template and not everything is 100% in sync and customization occurs between different client databases. We continually get pulled into performance issues and the developers will say Client A is performing different than Client B, why? Using SQL Compare, we usually find that one client was tuned and had indexes altered or added that weren't deployed to all clients or other objects weren't deployed correctly during the release. On the other hand, since our data model practices allow client databases to drift I tried to create a new golden image by trying to compare multiple databases based on the same data model and found it to be a very difficult process to complete using SQL Compare. SQL Compare gave me too much information and doesn't allow enough filtering to eliminate a lot of the noise.
Read full review It is a strong and reliable application security platform that helps to cover all aspects throughout the software development lifecycle of an application, making it a good fit for use in enterprise-scale applications. Its integration with CI/CD tools, multiple options for security scanning, and compliance reporting make it quite valuable in keeping a safe codebase. However, the learning curve is steep, and at times, false positives can prove to be very time-consuming and more effortful.
Read full review Pros Simple and easy comparison of database schemas and data. Differences can be copied or synced from one database to another with a click of a button. You can save "projects" so that you can easily rerun a previous comparison whenever you need to. It has a very simple, easy to learn interface. I've never needed to read any documentation or watch any tutorials in order to figure out how to do something. Read full review It is good at recommending fixing issues with third-party dependencies used in application code with detailed version information and knowing which version fixes what. It has a very nice interface for triaging flaws. One can sort the vulnerabilities found in code from Very Likely to be exploited to least likely to be exploited. There is a collections feature that allows us to group together groups of application profiles belonging to the same suite of applications. Read full review Cons Pricing.... I wish there was an inexpensive developer version I could buy for myself. Portability.... I would like to use it from a flash drive so I can use it where ever I am asked to work. Unbundled.... This may be available already but I dont' recall I can buy it cheaply as a stand-alone product. Its only part of the bundle - cost effectively. Read full review Scan results stability: from one scan to another, additional flaws appear whereas code did not change. Entry points selection: hard to be sure selection is optimal, should be automatized or hidden. Branches management: we currently use sandboxes to scan different branches of our software. Would be good to have real branches management. Read full review Likelihood to Renew At this time, and we just renewed a month ago, I dont see any products out there overall that can offer what Veracode does. Yes, its not cheap by any means, but for the money its the best application security scanning tool out there.
Read full review Usability It's a good tool to have, but becomes expensive to buy a user license for each developer.
Read full review - Almost no setup required and easy to configure - Very easy to use, intuitive UI with integrated analytics and learning portals. - Seamless to review the results, triage them, generate reports. - Security progression of the product/application is tracked via successive scans. - Privileges/Roles nicely fine grained and tightly controlled to let teams "view" only their products.
Read full review Reliability and Availability Veracode has always been up and available to us.
Read full review Performance At this point, it runs well and mostly in a timely fashion. Dynamic scans take days but this may be a config issue still to be resolved.
Read full review Support Rating They have a great community website where you can search for answers but are also very responsive when it comes to direct support.
Read full review Overall, Veracode support is helpful, community support is great, and documentation is available for self-service. Our Customer Success Manager is very helpful and reaches out regularly to see if we need assistance. We have not utilized many of the other resources offered by Veracode, however, in the future we would like to leverage secure coding training for our Development teams.
Read full review Implementation Rating We use it as a SAS service, so really just getting our teams to mold the use of Veracode into their SDLC has been a process of years in the making. It comes down to what your teams are ready and willing to accept and change. Management is key in getting their groups on board with using it regularly. If it doesnt have management backing, your security teams have little to no influence in getting this process off the ground fully.
Read full review Alternatives Considered I've used Visual Studio Database Projects for this type of work in the past with some success, but Redgate SQL Compare is faster, more transparent, and simply easier to use. Faster is self explanatory. More transparent, means that it's much easier to set up your desired options for schema change deployment scripts. Easier to use, It's really dead simple. Start a project, connect your source, connect destination, click compare.
Read full review Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same.
Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl.
Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both integration to DevOps tools were striaghtforward.
Read full review Scalability It meets our needs.
Read full review Return on Investment Makes deployment fairly simple. Cutting our deployment time down. With the SDK, we can customize our deployment process very quickly and easily. History is not great, it does create scripts you can go back and see but it would be nice to have a quicker version view by object to save time. Read full review Positive: Scanning all our applications on Veracode provides us an overview of our cyber security posture for the organization as a whole. Positive: Performing the SAST, SCA and DAST scanning for all the applications at the early stages of the SDLC helps us identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities early, reducing the risk of data breaches and cyber-attacks. Negative: Sometimes Veracode SAST scanner closed and reopens some findings, leading to reliability issues on the scanner itself. Read full review ScreenShots