evergreen by sa.global vs. Trimble ProjectSight

It's great for general research, including case law and secondary sources. I find that it's very comprehensive.

Incentivized

I would probably recommend Trimble ProjectSight (Prolog) over Procore, as it is an easier user interface and typically avoids any problems with the users. I would say that it does take some getting used to, but once you are used to it it is pretty easy to use. This would be good for a residential home in construction.

Incentivized

• Finds relevant case law quickly
• Has comprehensive secondary sources/treatises
• Provides timely news and law-related information
• Allows me to do a targeted search with any useful parameters

Incentivized

• Change orders: great way to send and document official communications to subs and clients.
• Drawings: always good to have drawings and info readily available.

Incentivized

• Sometimes, I find it difficult to receive a finite list of targeted search results

Incentivized

• speed. Some items take a bit long to bring up.
• more direct use for individual specifications

Incentivized

It does a better job of aggregating information than Westlaw. And, it has a better secondary source library.

Incentivized

I have only used Procore otherwise, and from what I remember Procore does not have as many features in terms of keeping track of CD documents, and organizing RFI's like Trimble does. I think overall Trimble ProjectSight (Prolog) is a better product, and if it was up to me I would pick Trimble ProjectSight (Prolog) over Procore.

Incentivized

• It has saved time in getting answers to specific question.
• I can bill a client more efficiently to get an answer to a question.

Incentivized

• Positive: kept jobs running smoothly, awesome tool to track and oversee projects
• Negative: not much really, good tool, just very in-depth with information that is needed to fill in documentation

Incentivized