SAI360 vs. SAP Responsible Design and Production

The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.

Incentivized

Scenarios where a company needs to have a lot of visibility and control over the materials it uses for manufacturing, companies that are generators of polluting materials and companies that need to manage different EPRs in different countries. It is perhaps less useful for smaller companies whose sector is not related or involved in waste management and who do not have much volume or presence abroad. These may be able to cope with a customised development that contains their costs.

• Customized unified design platform
• Modules that fit your organization
• Low technology involvement with information department.
• Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
• Single sign-on web-based applications

Incentivized

• Helps us redesign packaging for cost and waste savings.
• Reduces industrial waste, ensures timely delivery and decreases global carbon footprint.
• Helps us better optimize our packaging which leads to product longevity.
• Overall it gives us an edge in EPR compliances due to its versatile approaches.

• Reporting
• Legacy modules (i.e. tasks)
• Look and feel
• Intuitive UI

• On the subject of our Business, we need to have Ecovidrio (Ecoembes) declaration included in RDP, as soon as possible. It is urgent for us.
• The features feed for uploading information to the RDP should be more streamlined and user friendly
• I would also improve the data quality part, it doesn't really make it clear where the problem might lie.

As declarations will be incorporated, we will be able to have the data of all of them in one place, which allows us to be agile and save time and costs.

Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.

Incentivized

SAP Responsible Design and Production needs regulatory alignment.

Incentivized

Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be obtained. MetricStream was very modern looking with an intuitive UI. Appeared to have all the features with a number of additional bells and whistles. The price point was far above our budget and we could not get approval to move them to the RFP.

These are some of the other Risk Management softwares known of. Although these solutions may not match SAP's offerings as an entire package (as just focusing on the Risk management side for this question) and not fully knowledgeable to their capabilities but SAP Responsible Design and Production provides a reliable system that performs well and provides the data analytics we require.

• The system is costly for the initial setup
• Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
• One license for all users
• Easy to manage employee's security access

Incentivized

• It helped us to monitor impact of global regulations on our new product
• It helped us to manage the product packaging data
• It had a positive impact only, no negative points till now

Incentivized