SAI360

Score7.1 out of 10

11 Reviews and Ratings

What is SAI360?

SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.

Categories & Use Cases

Common repository of GRC items
A common repository linking all GRC elements such as policies, risks, regulations, etc.) to give a 360 degree view
Category average: 7.5
GRC policy management
Support for policy lifestyle changes including creation, approval, communication etc.
Category average: 7.3
Risk management
Risk management capabilities including alert engine to warn of trending risk exposure and risk visualizations like heat maps, dashboards, etc.
Category average: 7.4

Incident management
System captures risk-related incidents, including cause and result
Category average: 7.1
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
Ability to integrate with external CPM software
Category average: 6.5

#1 most frequent

Health Care and Social Assistance

32.1%

87 installations of 271

#2 most frequent

Finance and Insurance

22.1%

60 installations of 271

#3 most frequent

Manufacturing

10.7%

29 installations of 271

Fernando Moreno

Management Consultant in Professional Services at INSI (1-10 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We recommended SAI Ethics and Compliance Learning courses to train complete teams for satisfying the required training for implementing and certifying standardized management systems (ISO Standards) about multiple topics: anti-bravery, anti-corruption, data protection, HS&E, compliance, etc.

The library has multiple courses that support this goals for organizations. These courses are industry agnostic for most cases.

Pros

Communicating best practices for each topic covered
Easy to use platform
Tracking for multiple users

Cons

Detailed content about specific industries or situations
Different length and deep for each topic

Most Important Features

Compliant with internationally accepted best practices
Easy of use for all users

Return on Investment

Pre-built training courses for certification that have a higher ROI than building your own courses.
Helped customers training their personnel to achieve multiple management system certifications.

Other Software Used

monday.com, HubSpot CRM, Forecastr, Rippling

Larissa Munz View profile

Sr. Manager Technology & Operation at CUNA Mutual Group (1001-5000 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

SAI360 is one of the top 3 systems for our legal risk and compliance department. We use SAI360 to manage enterprise risk, regulatory complaints, product new laws & regs, and conflict of interest assessments.

Pros

Fully configurable forms & fields
Fully configurable workflow
No code platform

Cons

Reporting
Legacy modules (i.e. tasks)
Look and feel
Intuitive UI

Most Important Features

Custom fields & forms
Custom workflow
Permissions management
Customer support

Return on Investment

Less administration for risk assessments allowing for quarterly control assessments
100% removal of IT effort in our annual conflicts of interest assessments
Reduction of manual processes
Consolidation of legacy systems into SAI360

Alternatives Considered

MetricStream Platform and Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform

Other Software Used

Wolters Kluwer Passport Legal Spend and Matter Management, RegEd Compliance Management Solution Suite, Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management

Verified User

Consultant in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have used SAI360 for our risk management analysis dashboards. It was mostly used to proactively trigger plan activations and notifications to everyone who needs to see them. SAI360 also provides an inbuilt framework(best practice), which also helped in transition from our spreadsheets. The dashboards are pretty awesome to use.

Pros

The dashboards are pretty amazing to use and see real-time data
Workflow analysis
Another advantage is that it's easier to see what activities are open or overdue.

Cons

Customized workflows are a little tedious to create
Not ideal to have to report separate in Business objects.
Within the system, the internal audit module does not allow for the development of an audit report.

Most Important Features

Dashboards
Risk management
Built in frameworks

Return on Investment

It is costly

Kathy Diclemente View profile

Quality Specialist in Information Technology at UHS (5001-10,000 employees employees)

Pros

Customized unified design platform
Modules that fit your organization
Low technology involvement with information department.
Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
Single sign-on web-based applications

Cons

Enhancement with modules, they are siloed based on platforms.
Customer support for success
Form configuration and setup of the reports is a bit tedious
The report printout style sheet needs some improvement
The color scheme in the UI

Return on Investment

The system is costly for the initial setup
Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
One license for all users
Easy to manage employee's security access

Alternatives Considered

Risk Manager

Usability

Verified User

Team Lead in Finance and Accounting (10,001+ employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

BWise is used as a GRC platform to manage multiple compliance initiatives for SOX, IT compliance, PCI compliance, Procurement compliance, Internal Audit, and Management Self-testing.
BWise is integrated with TeamMate audit tracking, for internal audit testing and annual compliance testing.
BWise is used for testing across the enterprise, giving management a view into the control effectiveness, across the company, and across compliance initiatives.

Pros

Bwise is very customizable to accommodate multiple compliance initiatives, across the enterprise.
Integration with TeamMate, made tracking audit testing and results easy to stay on top of.
Being able to map controls, and test once, and report control effectiveness for multiple initiatives was important.

Cons

Integration with SAP for continuous control monitoring.
Control mapping to standards: ISO; COSO; COBIT; HIPAA; SP800_53 (NIST); FedRAMP; PCI_DSS; BITS; GAAP; AICPA; BSI; CCM; COPPA; CSA
Surveys.

Return on Investment

BWise was the most cost effective, and flexible solution evaluated, and eventually implemented.
BWise is a great repository for controls, and for managing GRC compliance.
BWise handled mapping multiple compliance initiatives to the master controls very well.
BWise integrated with TeamMate for testing controls very well.

Usability

Other Software Used

SAP Business Warehouse, Oracle BPM Suite, Microsoft SQL Server

Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform

MetricStream Platform

Diligent One Platform

SAI360

What is SAI360?

Categories & Use Cases

Key Features

Top Performing Features

Common repository of GRC items

GRC policy management

Risk management

Areas for Improvement

Incident management

Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems

Most Frequent Users

Health Care and Social Assistance

Finance and Insurance

Manufacturing

Reviews

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Most Important Features

Return on Investment

Other Software Used

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Most Important Features

Return on Investment

Alternatives Considered

Other Software Used

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Most Important Features

Return on Investment

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Alternatives Considered

Usability

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Other Software Used

Related Products