SAI360 vs. Techstreet

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SAI360
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.N/A
Techstreet
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Clarivate Analytics headquartered in Philadelphia offers Techstreet, web platform for searching and management of global standards for risk and compliance management.N/A
Pricing
SAI360Techstreet
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAI360Techstreet
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAI360Techstreet
Considered Both Products
SAI360
Chose SAI360
Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be …
Chose SAI360
Also evaluated, and implemented SAP GRC Process control for Continuous Control Monitoring in SAP. Initially selected BWise for cost and flexibility.
Chose SAI360
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
Techstreet

No answer on this topic

Features
SAI360Techstreet
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
SAI360
7.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Techstreet
4.3
Ratings
53% below category average
Common repository of GRC items9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Risk management7.30 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
GRC policy management8.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Incident management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SAI360Techstreet
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SAI360Techstreet
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SAI360Techstreet
Likelihood to Recommend
The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
Read full review
Techstreet would be suitable for building companies, certification companies, testing laboratories, and manufacturers. With Techstreet, you can purchase current and previous versions of standards and manuals from different accreditation companies. This is quite helpful for businesses that need to stay up-to-date on industry standards and regulations.
Read full review
Pros
  • Customized unified design platform
  • Modules that fit your organization
  • Low technology involvement with information department.
  • Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
  • Single sign-on web-based applications
Read full review
  • Has the latest versions of standards
  • Keeps a record of standards I already purchased
  • Sends notifications when a standard I purchased receives an update
Read full review
Cons
  • Internal Quality Check. I think this is the most prominent area BWise should improve on. Currently they lack internal Quality Check/Review.
  • Internal dialogue among employees. When various consultants are involved in the same project, their communication and updating each-other could be a bit stronger.
  • Inclusion of content. The application could benefit considerably from including some out-of-the-box content (e.g. COSO principles, Risk catalogs, etc.).
  • Risk Workshop functionality. This is one of the main functionalities that allows integration among different areas of an organization. However, it comes pretty much "take it or leave it"; it's almost not customizable.
  • Consultants' transparency. When an organization requests a particular design of the application or solicits changes to such design, it would be great if BWise consultants could always and more thoroughly advise on the implications of these changes, design to the organization's strategic objectives and ultimate target.
  • Product features. Application has room for improving its programming, e.g. providing internal checks when creating/answering an issue/finding (for instance, remedy implementation date cannot be before the recommendation response date or the recommendation creation date). Another example would be the possibility of automatic periodic followup (e.g. every 1 month until completion).
Read full review
  • Would be good to be able to share the standards with clients. But some of the standards are protected.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The system is costly for the initial setup
  • Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
  • One license for all users
  • Easy to manage employee's security access
Read full review
  • Before Techstreet, I had to go to multiple places to purchase the standards I needed. This was time-consuming and frustrating. But with Techstreet, I can find all the standards I need in one place, and their prices are really competitive.
  • I also appreciate that Techstreet is a full repository. This means that they have a huge selection of standards to choose from, including both current and previous versions. This is really helpful for me, because I often need to reference older versions of standards for reviewing test procedures or training purposes.
Read full review
ScreenShots